
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Makoto Taniguchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I was wondering, why does the North American accent (mainstream, not > >ebonics) differ so much from the British? when you look at other > >countries like New Zealand or Australia, you can clearly see a British > >element to their accent. So why does the North American accent differ > >so much from the other Anglo-occupied countries? > > The explanation is obviously that the British consume lots of marmite, > and the Australians have a counterpart, vegemite. As Canadians and > Americans aren't into either, their accent has diverged. Thus the > correlation is perfect, indicating that we need look no further for > an explanation. The argument is just as strong as many of those advocated > on this newsgroup as explaining evolution of various traits. American accents preserve a degree of middle and north country English accents of the 17th and 18th centuries, as well as having a strong Irish influence. And this is on-topic only to the extent that it explains why G.C. Williams is in such agreement with Maynard Smith and the Haldane school of evolutionary theory. And Vegemite is *waay* better than Marmite, although I will admit Marmite can also be used as axle grease if necessary. -- John Wilkins DARK IN HERE, ISN'T IT? wilkins.id.au
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |