
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Monarch Extinction (substantial evidence?)
- __From__: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- __Subject__: Re: Monarch Extinction (substantial evidence?)
- __Date__: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 12:25:54 -0600
Paul Cherubini wrote:
indeed, without natural regeneration brought about
by disturbances such as fire and moderate logging, the forest has lost
its vitality and is now extensively infested and in full decline."
Paul
You seem to imply that logging is taking place, or should be allowed, in
the Oyamel forests. Yet, in another message you said:
"logging of the forests in the 10,000 - 11,000 foot elevation range (the altitude
where the monarchs overwinter) is simply not the custom in Mexico."
Are you proposing logging should be encouraged at the higher elevations where the
Monarch overwinters?
Stan
------------------------------------------------------------
For subscription and related information about LEPS-L visit:
http://www.peabody.yale.edu/other/lepsl
- Re: Monarch Extinction (substantial evidence?), (continued)