Re: scientific method is a hoax?

Absolutely.

If Creationists actually used the scientific method to test their beliefs,
they would quickly find out that they have been living a lie and wasting
their whole lives on total nonsense. Reality is a concept they are
unequipped to handle.

There is that idiot on TV with that goofy religious show falsely called
"True Facts" that actually admitted that he once had a nervous breakdown and
lived in a cave. That he lost his marbles is not at all surprising but what
is surprising is that he admits it like it is something to be proud of.


> Give it up. Creationist types DO NOT believe in science period. They
> only use things that really DO NOT exist at all.
>
> --
> I live in zone 9B-10A
> The zone splits in my City
> I LIVE ON THE TREASURE COST OF FLORIDA


Phillip Sherman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cereoid-UR12- wrote:
> > The mechanism behind evolution has been experimentally proven to be
valid
> > millions of times over. Specifically, genetics has provided the
mathematical
> > basis behind evolution and DNA research has proven without a doubt the
> > validity of its biochemical basis.
> >
> > The only way you can reject evolution as being valid and proven
> > scientifically is if you are a complete idiot.
> >
> > Maybe you should take all your biology classes over again and pay
attention
> > this time?
> >
> > Watch out roadrunner. The coyote is after you and he has all the
resources
> > of the Acme corporation at his disposal. If he catches you, you're
> > through!!!
> >
> >
> > Roadrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >>"Cereoid-UR12-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>>The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax?
> >>>
> >>>Are you saying all this technology we now use everyday, including this
> >>
> >>very
> >>
> >>>computer you are using at this very moment, is the product of a long
> >>
> > line
> >
> >>of
> >>
> >>>innovations that resulted from the application of the scientific method
> >>
> > is
> >
> >>a
> >>
> >>>hoax?
> >>
> >>It's likely to work pretty accurate where it concerns areas where not so
> >>much guessing is involved.  It is a totaly different story however where
> >
> > it
> >
> >>concerns evolution.  If you start being scientific about this method you
> >>will understand what I refer to.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Maybe you should move out of you house, get rid of your automobile,
> >>
> > throw
> >
> >>>away your phone and get rid of every innovation that was conceived
> >>
> > thanks
> >
> >>to
> >>
> >>>science and go live in a cave?!!!
> >>>
> >>>How long ago was your nervous breakdown, Eddie?
> >>>It always seems that these Creationist types have had some sort of
> >>
> >>emotional
> >>
> >>>problems or history of drug abuse that they have suffered through
before
> >>>they completely rejected reality in favor of something even more far
> >>>fetched.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Roadrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>
> >>>>"Ed Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >>>>news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>
> >>>>>On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC), Stelios Zacharias
> >>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC), TomS
> >>>>>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>  From today's online "Science Daily"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>><http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/11/031113070616.htm>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>"Research Sheds New Light On Process Of Evolution
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>"For more than a century, scientists have concluded that a species
> >>>>>>
> >>>>evolves
> >>>>
> >>>>>>>or adapts by going through an infinite number of small genetic
> >>>>>>
> >>changes
> >>
> >>>>>>>over a long period of time.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>"However, a team of researchers, including a Michigan State
> >>>>>>
> >>University
> >>
> >>>>>>>plant biologist, has provided some new evidence that an alternate
> >>>>>>
> >>>theory
> >>>
> >>>>>>>is actually at work, one in which the process begins with several
> >>>>>>
> >>>large
> >>>
> >>>>>>>mutations before settling down into a series of smaller ones.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>"The research is published in the Nov. 12 issue of the journal
> >>>>>>
> >>>Nature."
> >>>
> >>>>>>SNIP
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>It's amazing what farfetched, factless, facetious theories
> >>>>>these pseudos can come up with -- with so much time on
> >>>>>their hands and to justify their existence (also, to pretend
> >>>>>they're earning their near six-digit salaries).
> >>>>>
> >>>>>More pseudoscientific crap.
> >>>>
> >>>>Indeed, it is interesting though to watch how time after time the
> >>>
> > misuse
> >
> >>>of
> >>>
> >>>>the word 'evidence'.   The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax, made
> >>>
> > up
> >
> >>>to
> >>>
> >>>>fool the lesser bright ones among us.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
>
> Give it up. Creationist types DO NOT believe in science period. They
> only use things that really DO NOT exist at all.
>
> --
> I live in zone 9B-10A
> The zone splits in my City
> I LIVE ON THE TREASURE COST OF FLORIDA
>