Re: scientific method is a hoax?

Cereoid-UR12- wrote:
> The mechanism behind evolution has been experimentally proven to be valid
> millions of times over. Specifically, genetics has provided the mathematical
> basis behind evolution and DNA research has proven without a doubt the
> validity of its biochemical basis.
>
> The only way you can reject evolution as being valid and proven
> scientifically is if you are a complete idiot.
>
> Maybe you should take all your biology classes over again and pay attention
> this time?
>
> Watch out roadrunner. The coyote is after you and he has all the resources
> of the Acme corporation at his disposal. If he catches you, you're
> through!!!
>
>
> Roadrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > "Cereoid-UR12-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax?
> > >
> > > Are you saying all this technology we now use everyday, including this
> >
> > very
> >
> > > computer you are using at this very moment, is the product of a long
> line
>
> > of
> >
> > > innovations that resulted from the application of the scientific method
> is
>
> > a
> >
> > > hoax?
> >
> > It's likely to work pretty accurate where it concerns areas where not so
> > much guessing is involved.  It is a totaly different story however where
>
> it
>
> > concerns evolution.  If you start being scientific about this method you
> > will understand what I refer to.
> >
> >
> >
> > > Maybe you should move out of you house, get rid of your automobile,
> throw
>
> > > away your phone and get rid of every innovation that was conceived
> thanks
>
> > to
> >
> > > science and go live in a cave?!!!
> > >
> > > How long ago was your nervous breakdown, Eddie?
> > > It always seems that these Creationist types have had some sort of
> >
> > emotional
> >
> > > problems or history of drug abuse that they have suffered through before
> > > they completely rejected reality in favor of something even more far
> > > fetched.
> > >
> > >
> > > Roadrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > > "Ed Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC), Stelios Zacharias
> > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC), TomS
> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >  From today's online "Science Daily"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/11/031113070616.htm>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "Research Sheds New Light On Process Of Evolution
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "For more than a century, scientists have concluded that a species
> > > > evolves
> > > >
> > > > > > > or adapts by going through an infinite number of small genetic
> > changes
> >
> > > > > > > over a long period of time.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "However, a team of researchers, including a Michigan State
> > University
> >
> > > > > > > plant biologist, has provided some new evidence that an alternate
> > > theory
> > >
> > > > > > > is actually at work, one in which the process begins with several
> > > large
> > >
> > > > > > > mutations before settling down into a series of smaller ones.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > "The research is published in the Nov. 12 issue of the journal
> > > Nature."
> > >
> > > > > > SNIP
> > > > >
> > > > > It's amazing what farfetched, factless, facetious theories
> > > > > these pseudos can come up with -- with so much time on
> > > > > their hands and to justify their existence (also, to pretend
> > > > > they're earning their near six-digit salaries).
> > > > >
> > > > > More pseudoscientific crap.
> > > >
> > > > Indeed, it is interesting though to watch how time after time the
> misuse
>
> > > of
> > >
> > > > the word 'evidence'.   The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax, made
> up
>
> > > to
> > >
> > > > fool the lesser bright ones among us.

Give it up. Creationist types DO NOT believe in science period. They 
only use things that really DO NOT exist at all.

--
I live in zone 9B-10A
The zone splits in my City
I LIVE ON THE TREASURE COST OF FLORIDA