Re: scientific method is a hoax?

The mechanism behind evolution has been experimentally proven to be valid
millions of times over. Specifically, genetics has provided the mathematical
basis behind evolution and DNA research has proven without a doubt the
validity of its biochemical basis.

The only way you can reject evolution as being valid and proven
scientifically is if you are a complete idiot.

Maybe you should take all your biology classes over again and pay attention
this time?

Watch out roadrunner. The coyote is after you and he has all the resources
of the Acme corporation at his disposal. If he catches you, you're
through!!!


Roadrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> "Cereoid-UR12-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax?
> >
> > Are you saying all this technology we now use everyday, including this
> very
> > computer you are using at this very moment, is the product of a long
line
> of
> > innovations that resulted from the application of the scientific method
is
> a
> > hoax?
>
> It's likely to work pretty accurate where it concerns areas where not so
> much guessing is involved.  It is a totaly different story however where
it
> concerns evolution.  If you start being scientific about this method you
> will understand what I refer to.
>
>
> >
> > Maybe you should move out of you house, get rid of your automobile,
throw
> > away your phone and get rid of every innovation that was conceived
thanks
> to
> > science and go live in a cave?!!!
> >
> > How long ago was your nervous breakdown, Eddie?
> > It always seems that these Creationist types have had some sort of
> emotional
> > problems or history of drug abuse that they have suffered through before
> > they completely rejected reality in favor of something even more far
> > fetched.
> >
> >
> > Roadrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > "Ed Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC), Stelios Zacharias
> > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC), TomS
> > > > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >>   From today's online "Science Daily"
> > > > >>
> > > > >><http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/11/031113070616.htm>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"Research Sheds New Light On Process Of Evolution
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"For more than a century, scientists have concluded that a species
> > > evolves
> > > > >>or adapts by going through an infinite number of small genetic
> changes
> > > > >>over a long period of time.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"However, a team of researchers, including a Michigan State
> University
> > > > >>plant biologist, has provided some new evidence that an alternate
> > theory
> > > > >>is actually at work, one in which the process begins with several
> > large
> > > > >>mutations before settling down into a series of smaller ones.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>"The research is published in the Nov. 12 issue of the journal
> > Nature."
> > > > >
> > > > > SNIP
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > It's amazing what farfetched, factless, facetious theories
> > > > these pseudos can come up with -- with so much time on
> > > > their hands and to justify their existence (also, to pretend
> > > > they're earning their near six-digit salaries).
> > > > >
> > > > More pseudoscientific crap.
> > >
> > > Indeed, it is interesting though to watch how time after time the
misuse
> > of
> > > the word 'evidence'.   The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax, made
up
> > to
> > > fool the lesser bright ones among us.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>