Re: scientific method is a hoax?

"Cereoid-UR12-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax?
>
> Are you saying all this technology we now use everyday, including this
very
> computer you are using at this very moment, is the product of a long line
of
> innovations that resulted from the application of the scientific method is
a
> hoax?

It's likely to work pretty accurate where it concerns areas where not so
much guessing is involved.  It is a totaly different story however where it
concerns evolution.  If you start being scientific about this method you
will understand what I refer to.


>
> Maybe you should move out of you house, get rid of your automobile, throw
> away your phone and get rid of every innovation that was conceived thanks
to
> science and go live in a cave?!!!
>
> How long ago was your nervous breakdown, Eddie?
> It always seems that these Creationist types have had some sort of
emotional
> problems or history of drug abuse that they have suffered through before
> they completely rejected reality in favor of something even more far
> fetched.
>
>
> Roadrunner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Ed Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC), Stelios Zacharias
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC), TomS
> > > ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >>   From today's online "Science Daily"
> > > >>
> > > >><http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/11/031113070616.htm>
> > > >>
> > > >>"Research Sheds New Light On Process Of Evolution
> > > >>
> > > >>"For more than a century, scientists have concluded that a species
> > evolves
> > > >>or adapts by going through an infinite number of small genetic
changes
> > > >>over a long period of time.
> > > >>
> > > >>"However, a team of researchers, including a Michigan State
University
> > > >>plant biologist, has provided some new evidence that an alternate
> theory
> > > >>is actually at work, one in which the process begins with several
> large
> > > >>mutations before settling down into a series of smaller ones.
> > > >>
> > > >>"The research is published in the Nov. 12 issue of the journal
> Nature."
> > > >
> > > > SNIP
> > > >
> > > >
> > > It's amazing what farfetched, factless, facetious theories
> > > these pseudos can come up with -- with so much time on
> > > their hands and to justify their existence (also, to pretend
> > > they're earning their near six-digit salaries).
> > > >
> > > More pseudoscientific crap.
> >
> > Indeed, it is interesting though to watch how time after time the misuse
> of
> > the word 'evidence'.   The 'scientific method' is simply a hoax, made up
> to
> > fool the lesser bright ones among us.
> >
> >
>
>