Re: size of evolutionary steps

On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:32:48 +0000 (UTC), Stelios Zacharias
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 13:21:38 +0000 (UTC), TomS
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>   From today's online "Science Daily"
>>
>><http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/11/031113070616.htm>
>>
>>"Research Sheds New Light On Process Of Evolution
>>
>>"For more than a century, scientists have concluded that a species evolves 
>>or adapts by going through an infinite number of small genetic changes 
>>over a long period of time.
>>
>>"However, a team of researchers, including a Michigan State University 
>>plant biologist, has provided some new evidence that an alternate theory 
>>is actually at work, one in which the process begins with several large 
>>mutations before settling down into a series of smaller ones.
>>
>>"The research is published in the Nov. 12 issue of the journal Nature."
>
> SNIP
>
>
It's amazing what farfetched, factless, facetious theories
these pseudos can come up with -- with so much time on
their hands and to justify their existence (also, to pretend
they're earning their near six-digit salaries).
>
More pseudoscientific crap.
>
Ed Conrad
>  http://www.edconrad.com
>
Man as Old as Coal