Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Terraforming Venus will be easier



[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kshatriya) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (habshi) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > But before this probably a moon base will be built first because thats
> > far easier to do . Actually Earth has more than enough living space
> > for us . What we should be interested about in Space is the
> > potentially unlimited source of Raw materials. Even if we dont end up
> > with a breathable atmosphere , colonizing moon and Venus to harness
> > thier almost limitless supply of raw materials is something worthwhile
> > doing . Yes we can get material from the asteroids , but mining on
> > Venus and moon will probably be far more efficient than carting
> > asteroids around ..
> 
> The earlier discussion on the feasibility of an Oniel industrial halo
> in Earth orbit was very interesting.  The requirements for producing
> energy, minerals,
> and manufactured goods didnt sound too far fetched. But farming ?
> Farming
> is best kept on Earth.
> 
> Another point on removing Venus' atmosphere - if it was ever made
> possible,
> a small portion of its CO2 could be dumped on our moon to give it a
> 0.5 bar
> atmosphere.

Good grief, now you intend to kill off all those Venus Cathars. I
realise that demise would make the Pope very happy but, is that the
best you have to offer?

Of all things lunar, robots don't need any stinking atmosphere, though
melting moon-ice could certainly start things going in the right
direction.

BTW; not even regarding my interpretation of those relatively crisp
SAR images of the Venus surface depicting several community like
infrastructures, there's way more than sufficient physics and of known
sciences that'll conclude on principal of the more than likely
possibility of there being significant life on Venus, in spite of it
being supposedly so hot and nasty, of which it is although, BTW again;
it actually isn't quite so hot and nasty within their extended 4-month
season of nighttime and, it's even less hot at elevation, of which
their atmospheric pressure combined with offering 10+km elevations and
mountains of 17+km is directly opposing the "status quo" of the NASA
bible disregarding truths with regard to the Venus environment (that's
government for you, dishonest and corrupt to the core).

The only satellite imaged planet within our solar system that's more
likely than Venus to still be supporting intelligent life is Earth,
and lately I'd have to reconsider the interpretation of "intelligent"
with respect to a great number of arrogant and subsequently way
over-valued individuals insisting that somehow pathetic Earth humans
have become the one and only center of the universe, and intelligent
none the less (if that's not sufficiently pure and evil arrogance,
then perhaps I don't know what is). The possibility that intelligent
life once existed on Mars is equally strong, though the emphasis needs
to be on the "once existed", as Mars is currently very well frozen and
otherwise irradiated to death, not to mention relatively geologically
inert or perhaps dead nearly to the core, which still doesn't exclude
the possibility of discovering remains of whatever as well as the
current existance of sufficiently mutated microbe life.

Fortunately, Venus offers a geologically active planet, loads of
natural energy resources (that happens to include CO2 for those of us
with half a brain), similar minerals to Earth and it's even surrounded
by a sufficiently thick and dense atmosphere that offers not only
massive kinetic energy but also life essential shielding from cosmic
radiation (I don't care how comfortable it is or not, if you're cosmic
radiated, you're dead), as well as affording a more than sufficient
nighttime season that's not only cooler but permits airship migrations
to their sunset communities. Rigid airships of Venus are rather
obvious in terms of the laws of physics, of rudimentary sciences and
that's not to mention common sense, as well as of more likely than not
the status quo of surviving on Venus, which absolutely imposes nothing
whatsoever with their need for anything radio, as opposed to utilizing
vastly more efficient and inter-species universal communications via
illuminations.
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/venus-air.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/airship-02.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/Air-Travel.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/radio-maybe.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/venus-bridge.htm
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/co2-windpower-03.htm
Plus there's a few dozen other pages.

Due to all the orchestrated email trashing that my discoveries and
subsequent research has attracted, if you'd like to convey something
outside of this post, goto the following public email link
(gv-bradguth-email-01) and post whatever, or simply call:
1-253-8576061 or fax: 1-253-8575318
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=gv-bradguth-email-01&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=5d28ff28.0309220058.6cbb3553%40posting.google.com&rnum=1



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.