Re: Need recent data for red shift vs. distance for stars

Hi,

It's friday night and I am going to go out to see if I can pick up any
chicks, but this questions is so interesting that
I spend some time searching the net for  it.  I found following web pages,
read them and we will discuss them later:

http://www.udel.edu/physics/csaapt/Fall2002/files/hubble.ppt

http://www2.3dresearch.com/~alistolmar/Resolving.htm

http://members.chello.nl/~n.benschop/startlin.htm

They suggest that photon's half life is:  4 pi / ( h.c 2 ) = photon
half-life (in seconds) or 6.5 billion years.

Bye now,
Babak Sehari



"eyelessgame" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Babak Sehari" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > Ok.  My theory basically is that there should be another explanation to
the
> > red shift than doppler shift.
>
> OK.
>
> > My theory suggest that light, like any other particle, is radio-active.
>
> Where's your data suggesting that this is the case?  Show the
> published papers -- or present for publication any papers -- that have
> demonstrated the radioactivity of photons, and we'll have a good place
> to start.
>
> [snip rest till we hear from him here]
>
> eyelessgame