Re: FRAUD STEFAN ANDERSON 'kasha' <shukra@sympatico.ca> <stephen4359@sympatico.ca>

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
 kasha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted: 
> [...]

A previous name and address of the con artist "Kasha":

"Stefan Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Current address:

"kasha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Posts from:

HSE-MTL-ppp69489.qc.sympatico.ca
HSE-MTL-ppp69210.qc.sympatico.ca

End of advisory

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
 
> Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> 
> > Some read, others lead
> >
> > By Arun Nehru
> > The Pioneer
> > Sunday, October 19, 2003
> >
> > Political developments have moved faster than I
> > anticipated in the recent past. All I can say is that
> > insecurity is at its peak among all political parties.
> > The BJP suffered the 'Taj trauma' as the Supreme Court
> > initiated action against all those suspected to be
> > involved in the Taj Heritage Corridor scandal. One
> > casualty was the coalition Government it shared with the
> > BSP in UP. The CBI in its raids has reportedly found
> > 'crores' in Mayawati's bank accounts, along with huge
> > amounts in her parents and brother's accounts. The former
> > Chief Minister's championship of poor Dalits has itself
> > come under a cloud-the champions seem to be very rich
> > Dalits without commensurate sources of income!
> >
> > The Congress has been making cautious noises about a
> > 'witchhunt', saying leaders of other parties too have
> > benami property. But it cannot really jump on to the
> > Mayawati bandwagon. For one thing, it has taken the moral
> > high ground far too many times on the issue of
> > 'corruption'. For another, the bank accounts and
> > properties unearthed by the investigative agency cannot
> > be wished away. There are also its ties with the
> > Samajwadi Party to think of. Moreover, the apex court
> > itself is monitoring events in the Taj project case.
> > Mayawati, characteristically, has been losing her cool.
> > The sad bit is, she has been lobbing wild allegations
> > against Central Government higher-ups; in the process,
> > she is losing her own credibility.
> >
> > In Maharashtra, after the the shattering Lok Sabha
> > election defeat, Sharad Pawar is clearly taking a hard
> > look at the reality of NCP-Congress relations. He
> > recently raised the issue of Sonia Gandhi's 'foreign
> > origin'. This prompted the Congress to issue instant
> > threats. Despite the patch-up, with Congress unit chief
> > Ranjit Deshmukh's retraction about any "ultimatum"
> > slapped on the NCP strongman, the ruling coalition may
> > well slip into troubled waters-and Sharad Pawar could
> > well have the last laugh!
> >
> > Look at the UP situation and the answers are clear. Will
> > the Congress align with the BSP-I personally don't think
> > this will happen-and what will be the impact? At this
> > stage, all I can say is that every action has a reaction,
> > and the political gymnastics that I have indicated will
> > become more frenetic as elections draw near. The
> > acrobatics, of course, have already started, since every
> > party knows there is no getting away from coalition
> > politics. The possible permutations and combinations for
> > the next General elections are already taking an early
> > shape.
> >
> > Mulayam Singh can get 40-50 seats in UP. Jayalalithaa in
> > Tamil Nadu can get 30 plus, and so can Chandrababu Naidu
> > in Andhra Pradesh. Sharad Pawar can be in this category
> > in Maharashtra as well. Even Laloo Yadav and Mayawati-if
> > she retains her cool and avoids harsh rhetoric -can be in
> > the 25-30 range. The numbers thrown up will be
> > complicated, but each of these leaders knows his or her
> > politics. As I see it, it seems clear the BJP citadel is
> > under severe threat, and the Congress is set to go below
> > the 100-mark. Of course, political astrology is not easy
> > business. Forecasts are necessarily highly speculative.
> > Yet I do see a 'third force' emerging, and certainly the
> > manoeuvres of Mulayam Singh and Sharad Pawar are in this
> > direction.
> >
> > The Congress need not react with alarm each time its top
> > boss's nativity is talked about. The reality is that
> > Sonia Gandhi is of foreign origin and became an Indian
> > citizen only in the 1980s. As I have said before, in the
> > information age, the media, particularly television,
> > hides nothing. The Congress chief's 'un-Indian' accent
> > and limited political ability and understanding are
> > reflected in the written notes on which she is so
> > dependent. As has been pointed out, she is sadly still
> > more a reader than a leader!
> >
> > The Supreme Court has been quoted by the pro-Sonia-as-PM
> > camp. But is anyone questioning her citizenship? The
> > questions are different in nature, and they will not stop
> > being raised. If anyone aspires to be Prime Minister,
> > should not the country know a little about his or her
> > family, and its place of residence and occupation? Where
> > did Sonia go to school and up to what class did she
> > study, besides having a diploma in English? There should
> > be no hesitation on the part of the aspirant to provide
> > such information. Was her name Antonia? Or is it Sonia?
> >
> > The Sonia-backing brigade can shout down dissent and
> > Congress-friendly sections of the media can black out
> > adverse news. But the questions will not go away, and
> > Sonia will always be under pressure. Yesterday it was
> > Mulayam Singh Yadav who foiled her 'backdoor' entry into
> > the Prime Minister's office. Today it is Sharad Pawar.
> > And both of these leaders are allies of sorts. Two
> > elections in 1998 and 1999 have resulted in declining
> > Congress fortunes. Election 2004 will be no different,
> > since her foreign origin will also be linked with her
> > limited knowledge of things Indian.
> >
> > It is indeed sad that Jitendra Prasad, Rajesh Pilot and
> > Madhavrao Scindia died one after another in tragic
> > circumstances. They represented leadership alternatives
> > for the Congress that would have benefited the party had
> > they been embraced. There is, however, still a great deal
> > of talent, but dynastic strings combined with Rajya Sabha
> > hopefuls will make internal change difficult. In fact,
> > another poor performance in the general elections may
> > well lead to a split rather than change.
> >
> > A great deal is said about dynastic succession but this
> > problem is not confined to politics. Look at the business
> > community, or lawyers and judges who have several
> > relatives in the same profession. The dynastic system
> > however promises no continuity of talent or success. It
> > would be unfair to blame the Congress alone for following
> > this regressive practice. If we look around us, we will
> > see that no one has ever shunned the advantages of his or
> > her birth or family associations. However, it is sheer
> > ability that prevails in the long run, in some cases
> > adding to acquired privileges.
> >
> > For instance, Farooq followed his father and Omar follows
> > him, and I think both the Abdullahs have done well. Omar,
> > despite the Ganderbal defeat, cannot be written off as
> > yet. Chandrababu emerged from NTR'S family, and warded
> > off several challenges in the process. Rabri Devi
> > followed Laloo Yadav and Mulayam Singh has Akhilesh in
> > the wings. There are also Devi Lal and Om Prakash
> > followed by Abhay in Haryana, and they are doing well.
> > Hundreds of similar cases can be cited, but every player
> > in the political field eventually survives on individual
> > merit and ability.
> >
> > Indiraji was different from Panditji but both were great
> > leaders. Rajiv inherited a huge mandate, but frittered it
> > away and his death sadly cut short his attempt to win
> > back his position and the people's confidence. Sonia has
> > notched a poor performance in two elections and may well
> > be followed by Rahul and Priyanka. The latter will
> > eventually be judged by their leadership qualities.
> > Anyone who has hopes in the future and the fact that the
> > younger generation has talent and dynamism must wish them
> > well. We came into the picture in our forties and most of
> > the seniors of the time were 15 to 20 years older. The
> > leaders of the 1980s and the 1990s are fading away.
> > Politics, like nature, allows no vacuum. Hence new talent
> > will naturally emerge.
> >
> > Finally, my mind wanders to Mamata Banerjee. In 1984, she
> > fought for and got a ticket. Rajiv had agreed to
> > accommodate her after seeing her determination and
> > combative spirit. We had little to lose at the time,
> > since she was fighting Somnathji and few expected him to
> > win. As anticipated, she won and over the years developed
> > into a leader. Unfortunately, she is often ridiculed for
> > her 'tantrums'. But few can deny her most impressive
> > quality: Integrity. I believe she recently lost her
> > sister-in-law, and her family members are still too poor
> > to afford the basics! Mamata continues to fight the
> > CPI(M), and this is not easy given that the Left had
> > Jyoti Basu and now Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, apart from a
> > very militant organisation. Mamata may have little else
> > but nerve. But that is enough to make her a leader.
> >
> > Read the complete news at:
> > http://www.dailypioneer.com
> >
> > Jai Maharaj
> > Creator of newsgroups alt.jyotish, alt.language.hindi, alt.religion.hindu
> > http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
> > http://www.mantra.com/jai
> > Om Shanti
> >
> > Panchaang for 6 Mrgshir 5104, Saturday, November 29, 2003:
> >
> > Shubhanu Nama Samvatsare Dakshinaya Jeevan Ritau
> >      Vrshchk Mase Shukl Pakshe Manta Vasara Yuktayam
> > Dhanishtth-Shatabhish Nakshatr Vyaghat Yog
> >      Gar-Vanij Karan Saptami Yam Tithau
> >
> > Hindu Holocaust Museum
> > http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
> >
> > Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
> > http://www.hindu.org
> > http://www.hindunet.org
> >
> > The truth about Islam and Muslims
> > http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
> >
> >      o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
> > educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of
> > this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent
> > the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law
> > and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
> >      o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> > considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
> > current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
> >      o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
> > are not necessarily those of the poster.
>