&some lead asray-about"DrJaiMaharajRe: SOME READ, OTHERS LEAD

  http://www.geocities.com/drjosemariachi/jay_faq.html#bb
http://x8.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=353985687
re "Dr Jai maharaj"
 use of the appellation Dr never explained.- no indication this person is
either an M.D. or has a
doctorate.
predicted that India would be involved in a military conflict in August 2003.

lack of jyotish rationale indicates that this wrong prediction was
plagiarized from a
Jyotishi.
claimed to have posted a predicted a date for the re-unification of India and

Pakistan in alt.astrology (did not)
promotes inter-religious strife in India from the hypocritical safety of the
United States(his posts always include links to his anti-Islam hate
literature)
just some of the milder questions one could raise:
 http://x8.dejanews.com/getdoc.xp?AN=353985687
 http://www.geocities.com/drjosemariachi/jay_faq.html#bb

"Dr. Jai Maharaj" wrote:

> Some read, others lead
>
> By Arun Nehru
> The Pioneer
> Sunday, October 19, 2003
>
> Political developments have moved faster than I
> anticipated in the recent past. All I can say is that
> insecurity is at its peak among all political parties.
> The BJP suffered the 'Taj trauma' as the Supreme Court
> initiated action against all those suspected to be
> involved in the Taj Heritage Corridor scandal. One
> casualty was the coalition Government it shared with the
> BSP in UP. The CBI in its raids has reportedly found
> 'crores' in Mayawati's bank accounts, along with huge
> amounts in her parents and brother's accounts. The former
> Chief Minister's championship of poor Dalits has itself
> come under a cloud-the champions seem to be very rich
> Dalits without commensurate sources of income!
>
> The Congress has been making cautious noises about a
> 'witchhunt', saying leaders of other parties too have
> benami property. But it cannot really jump on to the
> Mayawati bandwagon. For one thing, it has taken the moral
> high ground far too many times on the issue of
> 'corruption'. For another, the bank accounts and
> properties unearthed by the investigative agency cannot
> be wished away. There are also its ties with the
> Samajwadi Party to think of. Moreover, the apex court
> itself is monitoring events in the Taj project case.
> Mayawati, characteristically, has been losing her cool.
> The sad bit is, she has been lobbing wild allegations
> against Central Government higher-ups; in the process,
> she is losing her own credibility.
>
> In Maharashtra, after the the shattering Lok Sabha
> election defeat, Sharad Pawar is clearly taking a hard
> look at the reality of NCP-Congress relations. He
> recently raised the issue of Sonia Gandhi's 'foreign
> origin'. This prompted the Congress to issue instant
> threats. Despite the patch-up, with Congress unit chief
> Ranjit Deshmukh's retraction about any "ultimatum"
> slapped on the NCP strongman, the ruling coalition may
> well slip into troubled waters-and Sharad Pawar could
> well have the last laugh!
>
> Look at the UP situation and the answers are clear. Will
> the Congress align with the BSP-I personally don't think
> this will happen-and what will be the impact? At this
> stage, all I can say is that every action has a reaction,
> and the political gymnastics that I have indicated will
> become more frenetic as elections draw near. The
> acrobatics, of course, have already started, since every
> party knows there is no getting away from coalition
> politics. The possible permutations and combinations for
> the next General elections are already taking an early
> shape.
>
> Mulayam Singh can get 40-50 seats in UP. Jayalalithaa in
> Tamil Nadu can get 30 plus, and so can Chandrababu Naidu
> in Andhra Pradesh. Sharad Pawar can be in this category
> in Maharashtra as well. Even Laloo Yadav and Mayawati-if
> she retains her cool and avoids harsh rhetoric -can be in
> the 25-30 range. The numbers thrown up will be
> complicated, but each of these leaders knows his or her
> politics. As I see it, it seems clear the BJP citadel is
> under severe threat, and the Congress is set to go below
> the 100-mark. Of course, political astrology is not easy
> business. Forecasts are necessarily highly speculative.
> Yet I do see a 'third force' emerging, and certainly the
> manoeuvres of Mulayam Singh and Sharad Pawar are in this
> direction.
>
> The Congress need not react with alarm each time its top
> boss's nativity is talked about. The reality is that
> Sonia Gandhi is of foreign origin and became an Indian
> citizen only in the 1980s. As I have said before, in the
> information age, the media, particularly television,
> hides nothing. The Congress chief's 'un-Indian' accent
> and limited political ability and understanding are
> reflected in the written notes on which she is so
> dependent. As has been pointed out, she is sadly still
> more a reader than a leader!
>
> The Supreme Court has been quoted by the pro-Sonia-as-PM
> camp. But is anyone questioning her citizenship? The
> questions are different in nature, and they will not stop
> being raised. If anyone aspires to be Prime Minister,
> should not the country know a little about his or her
> family, and its place of residence and occupation? Where
> did Sonia go to school and up to what class did she
> study, besides having a diploma in English? There should
> be no hesitation on the part of the aspirant to provide
> such information. Was her name Antonia? Or is it Sonia?
>
> The Sonia-backing brigade can shout down dissent and
> Congress-friendly sections of the media can black out
> adverse news. But the questions will not go away, and
> Sonia will always be under pressure. Yesterday it was
> Mulayam Singh Yadav who foiled her 'backdoor' entry into
> the Prime Minister's office. Today it is Sharad Pawar.
> And both of these leaders are allies of sorts. Two
> elections in 1998 and 1999 have resulted in declining
> Congress fortunes. Election 2004 will be no different,
> since her foreign origin will also be linked with her
> limited knowledge of things Indian.
>
> It is indeed sad that Jitendra Prasad, Rajesh Pilot and
> Madhavrao Scindia died one after another in tragic
> circumstances. They represented leadership alternatives
> for the Congress that would have benefited the party had
> they been embraced. There is, however, still a great deal
> of talent, but dynastic strings combined with Rajya Sabha
> hopefuls will make internal change difficult. In fact,
> another poor performance in the general elections may
> well lead to a split rather than change.
>
> A great deal is said about dynastic succession but this
> problem is not confined to politics. Look at the business
> community, or lawyers and judges who have several
> relatives in the same profession. The dynastic system
> however promises no continuity of talent or success. It
> would be unfair to blame the Congress alone for following
> this regressive practice. If we look around us, we will
> see that no one has ever shunned the advantages of his or
> her birth or family associations. However, it is sheer
> ability that prevails in the long run, in some cases
> adding to acquired privileges.
>
> For instance, Farooq followed his father and Omar follows
> him, and I think both the Abdullahs have done well. Omar,
> despite the Ganderbal defeat, cannot be written off as
> yet. Chandrababu emerged from NTR'S family, and warded
> off several challenges in the process. Rabri Devi
> followed Laloo Yadav and Mulayam Singh has Akhilesh in
> the wings. There are also Devi Lal and Om Prakash
> followed by Abhay in Haryana, and they are doing well.
> Hundreds of similar cases can be cited, but every player
> in the political field eventually survives on individual
> merit and ability.
>
> Indiraji was different from Panditji but both were great
> leaders. Rajiv inherited a huge mandate, but frittered it
> away and his death sadly cut short his attempt to win
> back his position and the people's confidence. Sonia has
> notched a poor performance in two elections and may well
> be followed by Rahul and Priyanka. The latter will
> eventually be judged by their leadership qualities.
> Anyone who has hopes in the future and the fact that the
> younger generation has talent and dynamism must wish them
> well. We came into the picture in our forties and most of
> the seniors of the time were 15 to 20 years older. The
> leaders of the 1980s and the 1990s are fading away.
> Politics, like nature, allows no vacuum. Hence new talent
> will naturally emerge.
>
> Finally, my mind wanders to Mamata Banerjee. In 1984, she
> fought for and got a ticket. Rajiv had agreed to
> accommodate her after seeing her determination and
> combative spirit. We had little to lose at the time,
> since she was fighting Somnathji and few expected him to
> win. As anticipated, she won and over the years developed
> into a leader. Unfortunately, she is often ridiculed for
> her 'tantrums'. But few can deny her most impressive
> quality: Integrity. I believe she recently lost her
> sister-in-law, and her family members are still too poor
> to afford the basics! Mamata continues to fight the
> CPI(M), and this is not easy given that the Left had
> Jyoti Basu and now Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, apart from a
> very militant organisation. Mamata may have little else
> but nerve. But that is enough to make her a leader.
>
> Read the complete news at:
> http://www.dailypioneer.com
>
> Jai Maharaj
> Creator of newsgroups alt.jyotish, alt.language.hindi, alt.religion.hindu
> http://www.mantra.com/jyotish
> http://www.mantra.com/jai
> Om Shanti
>
> Panchaang for 6 Mrgshir 5104, Saturday, November 29, 2003:
>
> Shubhanu Nama Samvatsare Dakshinaya Jeevan Ritau
>      Vrshchk Mase Shukl Pakshe Manta Vasara Yuktayam
> Dhanishtth-Shatabhish Nakshatr Vyaghat Yog
>      Gar-Vanij Karan Saptami Yam Tithau
>
> Hindu Holocaust Museum
> http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
>
> Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
> http://www.hindu.org
> http://www.hindunet.org
>
> The truth about Islam and Muslims
> http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
>
>      o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the
> educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of
> this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent
> the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law
> and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
>      o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
> considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name,
> current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
>      o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others
> are not necessarily those of the poster.