
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003 00:21:59 +0000, in alt.astrology, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dee) wrote: >Bob Officer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:18:04 +0100, in alt.astrology, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dee) wrote: >> >> >viveshwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Dee wrote: >> >> >> >> > > What I'm complaining about is the stupid attempt to make a sacred >> >> > > principle out of this piece of humbug called "Godwin's Law." And it's >> >> > > not an attemept to blame it on anyone, it's just an observation. >> >> > >> >> > The Complaint Department is on the third floor. No wait, Sacred >> >> > Principles has been moved to the Basement, due to the OverFlow. Just >> >> > some directions. >> >> > >> >> > > (Watch closely; they're circling; which piranha will be the first to >> >> > > strike?) >> >> > >> >> > Are those Nazi piranhas? ;-) >> >> > >> >> I'm afraid you're just a hopeless newbie, dee. Please read Godwin's >> >> Law. You see, there's this ancient venerable Usenet taboo on the word >> >> "Nazi". But we're not allowed to discuss it, because by doing that we >> >> 'invoke" Godwin's Law, and that kills the thread. >> > >> >Don't you believe in reincarnation? >> >> Reincarnation is the keystone to the Hindu's caste system. The caste a >> person is born to is dictated by their actions and attitude in their past >> life. >> >> This insures, very logically, that power and wealth says concentrated in >> the elite few, and the elite few are served by the less elite many. >> >> This makes as much sense as the divine right of kings in Europe. > >Or the divine right of Dubya. Or in some cases X, Y and Z. >> >> But it seems that, as it said in that hopelessly feckless junk flick >> >> "Hawaii" -- *"The_Gods_Are_Changing!* It was considered unnecessary in >> >> that relentlessly banal non-discussion of Polynesian pseudo-culture to >> >> mention *what* the Gods were changing in that particular case. Perhaps >> >> it was their underwear. >> > >> >Lol! BTW, Blatant Digression = New Thread >> > >> >> But it seems overwhelming clear that, in this particular case, what the >> >> Gods are undoubtedly changing is Godwin's Law. Clearly we need another >> >> "law" -- perhaps one that states "whatever is forbidden on Usenet >> >> automatically gets discussed endlessly". Let's call it "Bobo's Law". >> > >> >It's already called "Flogging a Dead Horse". >> >> Jesus, Viv wants to enshrine me... > >That's what _I_ thought. > >> How in the hell did this happen? > >Just lucky, I guess ;-) How did I get so lucky? -- Aktohdi
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |