Re: Governator Schwarzenegger

Bob Officer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003 23:18:04 +0100, in alt.astrology,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dee) wrote:
> 
> >viveshwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Dee wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> > > What I'm complaining about is the stupid attempt to make a sacred
> >> > > principle out of this piece of humbug called "Godwin's Law."  And it's
> >> > > not an attemept to blame it on anyone, it's just an observation.
> >> > 
> >> > The Complaint Department is on the third floor. No wait, Sacred
> >> > Principles has been moved to the Basement, due to the OverFlow. Just
> >> > some directions.
> >> > 
> >> > > (Watch closely; they're circling; which piranha will be the first to
> >> > > strike?)
> >> > 
> >> > Are those Nazi piranhas? ;-)
> >> > 
> >> I'm afraid you're just a hopeless newbie, dee.  Please read Godwin's
> >> Law.  You see, there's this ancient venerable Usenet taboo on the word
> >> "Nazi".  But we're not allowed to discuss it, because by doing that we
> >> 'invoke" Godwin's Law, and that kills the thread. 
> >
> >Don't you believe in reincarnation?
> 
> Reincarnation is the keystone to the Hindu's caste system. The caste a
> person is born to is dictated by their actions and attitude in their past
> life.
> 
> This insures, very logically, that power and wealth says concentrated in
> the elite few, and the elite few are served by the less elite many.
> 
> This makes as much sense as the divine right of kings in Europe. 

Or the divine right of Dubya.

> >> But it seems that, as it said in that hopelessly feckless junk flick
> >> "Hawaii" -- *"The_Gods_Are_Changing!*  It was considered unnecessary in
> >> that relentlessly banal non-discussion of Polynesian pseudo-culture to
> >> mention *what* the Gods were changing in that particular case.  Perhaps
> >> it was their underwear. 
> >
> >Lol! BTW, Blatant Digression = New Thread 
> >
> >> But it seems overwhelming clear that, in this particular case, what the
> >> Gods are undoubtedly changing is Godwin's Law.  Clearly we need another
> >> "law" -- perhaps one that states "whatever is forbidden on Usenet
> >> automatically gets discussed endlessly".  Let's call it "Bobo's Law".
> >
> >It's already called "Flogging a Dead Horse".
> 
> Jesus, Viv wants to enshrine me...

That's what _I_ thought.
  
> How in the hell did this happen?

Just lucky, I guess ;-)