
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
viveshwar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dee wrote: > > > > > What I'm complaining about is the stupid attempt to make a sacred > > > principle out of this piece of humbug called "Godwin's Law." And it's > > > not an attemept to blame it on anyone, it's just an observation. > > > > The Complaint Department is on the third floor. No wait, Sacred > > Principles has been moved to the Basement, due to the OverFlow. Just > > some directions. > > > > > (Watch closely; they're circling; which piranha will be the first to > > > strike?) > > > > Are those Nazi piranhas? ;-) > > > I'm afraid you're just a hopeless newbie, dee. Please read Godwin's > Law. You see, there's this ancient venerable Usenet taboo on the word > "Nazi". But we're not allowed to discuss it, because by doing that we > 'invoke" Godwin's Law, and that kills the thread. Don't you believe in reincarnation? > But it seems that, as it said in that hopelessly feckless junk flick > "Hawaii" -- *"The_Gods_Are_Changing!* It was considered unnecessary in > that relentlessly banal non-discussion of Polynesian pseudo-culture to > mention *what* the Gods were changing in that particular case. Perhaps > it was their underwear. Lol! BTW, Blatant Digression = New Thread > But it seems overwhelming clear that, in this particular case, what the > Gods are undoubtedly changing is Godwin's Law. Clearly we need another > "law" -- perhaps one that states "whatever is forbidden on Usenet > automatically gets discussed endlessly". Let's call it "Bobo's Law". It's already called "Flogging a Dead Horse".
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |