Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Governator Schwarzenegger



On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:03:43 +0100, in alt.astrology,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dee) wrote:

>Bob Officer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:26:44 +0100, in alt.astrology,
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dee) wrote:
>> 
>> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Dee wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> > 
>> >> > > <Followup to alt.usenet.clueless.nazis deleted>
>> >> > > 
>> >> > > This thread has gotten completely off the topic.  (WHY does that no
>> >> > > longer surprize me?)
>> >> > 
>> >> > Because your entire previous poast in this thread was about Godwin's
>> >> > Law? Which was completely off the topic...
>> >> 
>> >> Well, Dee, you just became an outlaw by continuing this thread,
>> >
>> >Heh. I've never even gotten a parking ticket, sounds like fun.
>> 
>> Ride a bike, Get a tattoo... Drink some brew, and have fun?
>
>Everything except the tattoo :-)

Depends on how much you have to drink?



>> >> which as ritually killed by Nazis who invoked Godwin's law on it.
>> >
>> >Oh, well! It was while it lasted.
>> 
>> Viv still hasn't read what Godwin's is about... 
>
>Then it's rilly silly to shriek about it. 

No kidding...

>> >> THEY brought it up.  I was trying to explain to the thick-headed goons
>> >> what you just proved:  Godwin's law is humbug.
>> >
>> >Then why are you so bothered by it?
>> 
>> Because it is trying to troll up non-issues.
>
>Gee, where have I seen _that_ before?

I don't know.

>> >> So you see, it was just this process exactly; this one right here, me
>> >> responding to someone.  That I chose to respond doesn't change the fact
>> >> that THEY were the ones who took the thread off topic.  
>> >
>> >So you took it off again.
>> >What on earth are you complaining^H^H^H^H^whinging about?
>> 
>> IT just is trolling...
>
>I don't mind feeding the trolls... And I bet you 18 quatloons that IT
>has a penis.

I let you do the looking...

>> >> Now I ask you, Dee (this is a REAL question; I'm REALLY trying to
>> >> understand this), What is a worse Usenet crime, breaking Godwin's
>> >> (God-forsaken) Law, or taking the thread off the topic?
>> >
>> >Crime? Lol! Let's see... 'Nazi' is getting pretty lame... and I take
>> >threads off the topic all the time...
>> 
>> Threads should developed a life of their own. Free range discussions are
>> how people learn. It really makes diversity sing when you get a large
>> number of people with different idea discussing all sort of stuff.
>
>Plus it's more fun. 

Bingo... Fun...

>> >Bob (among others) has given you several free clues, might as well use
>> >'em.
>> 
>> I might take them back, if this keep up.
>
>Heh!

Yep...

>> >I think that someone trying to get peoples ISP accounts nuked for
>> >disagreeing with them is a Usenet crime...
>> 
>> It is surely a violation of what usenet is supposed to be.
>
>It's supposed to _be_ something? 

For posting?


-- 
Aktohdi



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.