
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Wed, 8 Oct 2003 23:03:43 +0100, in alt.astrology, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dee) wrote: >Bob Officer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 22:26:44 +0100, in alt.astrology, >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dee) wrote: >> >> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Dee wrote: >> >> >> >> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> > > <Followup to alt.usenet.clueless.nazis deleted> >> >> > > >> >> > > This thread has gotten completely off the topic. (WHY does that no >> >> > > longer surprize me?) >> >> > >> >> > Because your entire previous poast in this thread was about Godwin's >> >> > Law? Which was completely off the topic... >> >> >> >> Well, Dee, you just became an outlaw by continuing this thread, >> > >> >Heh. I've never even gotten a parking ticket, sounds like fun. >> >> Ride a bike, Get a tattoo... Drink some brew, and have fun? > >Everything except the tattoo :-) Depends on how much you have to drink? >> >> which as ritually killed by Nazis who invoked Godwin's law on it. >> > >> >Oh, well! It was while it lasted. >> >> Viv still hasn't read what Godwin's is about... > >Then it's rilly silly to shriek about it. No kidding... >> >> THEY brought it up. I was trying to explain to the thick-headed goons >> >> what you just proved: Godwin's law is humbug. >> > >> >Then why are you so bothered by it? >> >> Because it is trying to troll up non-issues. > >Gee, where have I seen _that_ before? I don't know. >> >> So you see, it was just this process exactly; this one right here, me >> >> responding to someone. That I chose to respond doesn't change the fact >> >> that THEY were the ones who took the thread off topic. >> > >> >So you took it off again. >> >What on earth are you complaining^H^H^H^H^whinging about? >> >> IT just is trolling... > >I don't mind feeding the trolls... And I bet you 18 quatloons that IT >has a penis. I let you do the looking... >> >> Now I ask you, Dee (this is a REAL question; I'm REALLY trying to >> >> understand this), What is a worse Usenet crime, breaking Godwin's >> >> (God-forsaken) Law, or taking the thread off the topic? >> > >> >Crime? Lol! Let's see... 'Nazi' is getting pretty lame... and I take >> >threads off the topic all the time... >> >> Threads should developed a life of their own. Free range discussions are >> how people learn. It really makes diversity sing when you get a large >> number of people with different idea discussing all sort of stuff. > >Plus it's more fun. Bingo... Fun... >> >Bob (among others) has given you several free clues, might as well use >> >'em. >> >> I might take them back, if this keep up. > >Heh! Yep... >> >I think that someone trying to get peoples ISP accounts nuked for >> >disagreeing with them is a Usenet crime... >> >> It is surely a violation of what usenet is supposed to be. > >It's supposed to _be_ something? For posting? -- Aktohdi
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |