Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

The *case is closed* (Lawsuit from a kook)



> Bob Officer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
  
>>>DrPostman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message >>>news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

>>>Dr.Postman alias Dr.Punkman wrote: You've exposed yourself,pervert.
 
exposed myself ? when ? you accused me to spread worms and virus in
the net..wrong see google: author:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
>>>> And they will see how you were the cause of people getting virus
>>>> sent to their email.  This was because you, for some reason you
>>>> have not explained to this day, had their addresses on that system.
 
> > > >Are you sure the virus infected mails were from him (you know, by
> > > >verifying the received from IP, host and so on from the mail header)?
>  
> > > I did the work and trace routes on the IPs. That all came from the same
> > > identical IP address and the time stamps were concurrent.
>  
> > > >Of course as I have never posted here before, I don't know the history
> > > >of this problem, but I have seen similar things happen other places,
> > > >where the person accused of having an infected machine where in fact
> > > >not responsible at all. Many modern mass mailing worms have a SMTP
> > > >functionality built in, and will scan the hard drive for mail
> > > >addresses (address books and browser caches for example), and chose
> > > >one to spoof as the sender. This means that the person that gets all
> > > >the complaints is in fact not infected(a virus doesn't send itself to
> > > >this person, as that would be suspicious) and so it will take more
> > > >time to track the source of the mails. Even if the person that started
> > > >the thread was the originator, it doesn't mean he has added you to his
> > > >address list, as the virus could just as well have found the addresses
> > > >in a browser cache or something like that...
  
> I did header trace of the IP origin. 
  
> > > >I my self have received several mails from mail systems warning me
> > > >that the mail I sent was infected, when I never have sent any mails to
> > > >them, never have had a virus infection.. Either someone that have my
> > > >address in their list must have had the virus, or someone who has been
> > > >on a site where my mail vas listed got infected, and the virus digged
> > > >the address from this persons cache... Anyway, its quite frustrating
> > > >being marked as a virus spreader, when one knows one is innocent of
> > > >this.
>  
> > > >This is not an attempt to absolve the thread starter of the blame if
> > > >he is the guilty one... I just thought I would mention this
> > > >possibility, just to make sure it was taken in to account, If you have
> > > >taken this in to account, I apologize for bothering you...
  
>He was guilty. Even the internet cafe he was using, barred him.
  
..oh yes ! they barred me ! while they always agreed with me to sue
you...and as a matter of fact right now I'm in grazia internet ...what a
 .. LIAR !
 
YOU DID INFECT [EMAIL PROTECTED] a couple of month ago ..like YOU
infected [EMAIL PROTECTED] it is a matter of time and you PUNK will
go in jail where you belong ...the case is close LIAR!
  
 
*again* now the *case is closed*
 
judoka_61



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.