
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Red shift and homogeneity
- __From__: Aladar
- __Subject__: Re: Red shift and homogeneity
- __Date__: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:04:15 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Greenfield) wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
[...]
>
> You accept that the galaxies have certain red shifts, because they
> were formed "on the move". But if the red shift is due to (say) the
> age at which it is seen, or its distance, or properties of light yet
> to be determined-- any of these may in the future torpedo expansion.
[...]
>
> Cheers
> Jim G
The property of light that in order to regenerate itself it has to
give-up some of its energy content - already torpedoed the big bangology
and requires a major tabula rasa in physics.
Cheers!
Aladar
http://www.stolmarphysics.com
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity, (continued)
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Jeff Root
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
George Dishman
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
George Dishman
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Aladar
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Bjoern Feuerbacher
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
sean
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
George Dishman
- Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
George Dishman
Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Jeff Root
Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Jeff Root
Re: Red shift and homogeneity,
Jim Greenfield