Re: Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

Dear Aleksandr Timofeev:

"Aleksandr Timofeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
>  Thanks, Bill, yes, I honestly think my logic will have any impact on
> someone who is listen to it...
> ca314159 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

...said nothing in support of your claims.
but this did not dissuade you for claiming a "convert".

>    Photoeffect, Raman and Compton effects and all other phenomena
> have physically correct explanation only from the point of Plank's
> view.

Unsupported statement.

> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Carr) wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...

...disagreed with a Maxwellian solution in its entirety for Compton
scattering.
but this did not dissuade you for claiming another "convert".

> Eric Prebys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> has run away from a field
> of this battle.

... which only says that he got tired of your fully circular arguments.

Rotate one of the polarizers to be exactly 90° to one of the others.  See
how many signals drop out.  Really simple, Alexsandr.  Otherwise your
conundrum is not fully developed.

David A. Smith