
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: recoiling photons evidence?
- __From__: George Dishman
- __Subject__: Re: recoiling photons evidence?
- __Date__: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 06:59:45 -0600
"ralph sansbury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > It may be that the Newtonian formula could be modified to
> > > (GMm/2^2)(1+km*/m) so that when you divide by m to get the
> > > acceleration you still have m* representing the variable mass
> similar
> to what is done in relativity but not the same as relativity.
> That is, the attractive mass is assumed to be due to
> electrostatic dipole
> inside protons and neutrons of length 10^-18 meters so that
Answer me two questions Ralph:
1. How does the force between two dipoles vary with distance?
2. How did the anomalous acceleration of Pioneer vary with distance?
George
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?, (continued)
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
George Dishman
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
Jeff Root
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
Jeff Root
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
ralph sansbury
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
ralph sansbury
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
George Dishman
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
George Dishman
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
ralph sansbury
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
George Dishman
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
ralph sansbury
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
ralph sansbury
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
Craig Markwardt
- Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
ralph sansbury
Re: recoiling photons evidence?,
ralph sansbury