
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
RS The confusion is in the inadequate concept. The rest mass of a photon is zero, its mass in motion due to the relativity increase is infinity so (1/2)mv^2 =(1/2)mc^4 =infinity times c^4 but also hf where f is the frequency is equal to the kinetic energy of the moving photon (1/2)mv^2. This says that infinity is equal to a finite number. Because of such confusion in the concept I am questioning conclusions like you're here based on its use. Re a solar sail, this involves much stronger magnetic forces than the absorption of radiation by a distant spacecraft antenna.
GD I'm not aware of any magnetic effect on solar sails.
RS I am aware of the light momentum photon energy argument "that when light is emitted from a source there is a recoil effect". But I am suggesting that there is no evidence for cases like the 8Watt transmitter on a distant spacecraft and that solar sails involve much greater Wattage and that light pressure on mirrors etc involve oscillations in the source and the receiver/reflector acting on each other. That is the mechanism(see Feynman Lectures p34-10), Bvq, on oscillating charge moving up and down at velocity v in the direction of the propagation of the fields E and B causes a driving pressure in the direction of the light beam which is called light pressure. Do you know any evidence besides the blanket application of the momentum argument showing such pressure effects in cases where the emission of photons occurs in an isolated source like the spacecraft? Ralph
MECHANICAL ACTION OF LIGHT ON ATOMS http://www.wspc.com/books/physics/0585.html
Laser Manipulation of Atoms http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/clockdev/slowing.htm
for instance. -- Rabbit arithmetic - 1 plus 1 equals 10 Remove spam and invalid from address to reply.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |