Re: Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

I receive GOOGLE's messages:
" Unable to retrieve message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "
" Server Error
The server encountered an error and could not complete 
your request.
If the problem persists, please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and mention this error message and the query that caused it. "

for Message 235 in thread From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
=======================================================================
Message 235 in thread 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] \(formerly\) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY
CONDITIONS
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, sci.astro
Date: 2003-09-27 06:28:22 PST 
 

Dear Aleksandr Timofeev:

"Aleksandr Timofeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED] \(formerly\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
...
> > Like "when will Sergey get to the point"?  The title is boundary
> > conditions.
>
> " The title is boundary conditions. "
>
> Any nonlinear processes are intimately interlinked
> to BOUNDARY CONDITIONS and concepts of NATURAL or IMPROPER SPACES. ...
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> These circumstances explain the reasons of crash of a RELATIVITY in
> QM.
> " INTERIOR (latent) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS, NATURAL ELECTRICAL SPACE "
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Like how the bonding structure of the metal under consideration 
has control of only the threshold, yet you provide a 4 segment 
RC circuit?  
Not all metals have 4 segment bonding, much less 4 segments 
to feedback to the "point" of adsorption.

I understand that each model has an area of applicability.  
Relativity and the wave model have this in common... 
they only apply to the host, since at their hearts they depend 
on infinite sums (aka. integration).  Relativity is not the point 
here, unless you are simply trying to prod some sucker into this 
thread again.

So since your defense and response is based on a quantum 
(aka. discrete) model, you must already accept that photons 
are discrete.  How nice.

David A. Smith
=======================================================================

" So since your defense and response is based on a quantum 
(aka. discrete) model, you must already accept that photons 
are discrete.  How nice."

                                       David A. Smith

Dr. Rodney B. Hall of the University of Iowa writes: 
" Perhaps faith or the lack of it is simply a matter 
of indoctrination. You have been indoctrinated 
by the priests or the professors or both. "

http://surf.de.uu.net/bookland/sci/farce/farce_toc.html

"(_not_ the security of felons in their felony) ":

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=rmOq8.7028%24_Y5.735%40news.easynews.com


http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=df6db65f.0303130321.d5aa4c8%40posting.google.com

VLBI is the direct experimental proof glaring inaccuracy of a
hypothesis about existence of "photon" as a particle and 
" "particle-wave duality" model ".

     The photon is mathematical abstraction, which in the implicit
(latent) form reflects existence of discrete power levels in
microsystems and as a corollary a capability of exchange by
electromagnetic energy between systems only by discrete portions.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=e16a4a22.0208200006.18f38ef0%40posting.google.com