Re: Gravitation and Maxwell's Electrodynamics, BOUNDARY CONDITIONS

Dear Aleksandr Timofeev:

"Aleksandr Timofeev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED] \(formerly\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
...
> > Like "when will Sergey get to the point"?  The title is boundary
> > conditions.
>
> " The title is boundary conditions. "
>
> Any nonlinear processes are intimately interlinked
> to BOUNDARY CONDITIONS and concepts of NATURAL or IMPROPER SPACES.
...
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> These circumstances explain the reasons of crash of a RELATIVITY in
> QM.
> " INTERIOR (latent) BOUNDARY CONDITIONS, NATURAL ELECTRICAL SPACE "
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Like how the bonding structure of the metal under consideration has control
of only the threshold, yet you provide a 4 segment RC circuit?  Not all
metals have 4 segment bonding, much less 4 segments to feedback to the
"point" of adsorption.

I understand that each model has an area of applicability.  Relativity and
the wave model have this in common... they only apply to the host, since at
their hearts they depend on infinite sums (aka. integration).  Relativity
is not the point here, unless you are simply trying to prod some sucker
into this thread again.

So since your defense and response is based on a quantum (aka. discrete)
model, you must already accept that photons are discrete.  How nice.

David A. Smith