www.Usenet.com
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Nick M V Salmon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
but would you even notice if you were built to withstand the original gravitational forces & temperatures on the surface of a supergiant star..? Perhaps you'd be feeling rather stretched on the rack of tidal forces at the same time as you were smeared out impossibly thin..? <LOL> Or perhaps you wouldn't notice because tidal forces, vertical & horizontal compression plus increasing heat & time dilation all balance out, who knows until someone tries it and I'm not volunteering for that one. ;-) ]
From what I can gather, anytime an object relatively approaches the speed of light, the ability of any matter to stay in one piece is greatly reduced by the fact that, what ever forces are holding it together have less time to react to what ever it runs into.
Where did this come from? Local time is the same no matter how fast you are going or accelerating. Between relativistic and nonrelavistic movement you'll see that time appears to be moving slower in the relativistic frame, but in the relativistic frame everything works as normal.
As far as what is percieved by something
inside a black hole, my understandind is that even the best theorist working
with string theory cannot get definitive answers.
String theory does not give definitive answers. It's not really given any answers at all to date.
From what I heard, all the formulas they use start to fall apart just like the matter itself. It is my speculation that the inside of a black-hole effectively becomes pure energy after a point.
This is one thing that could allow one to explode again,
especially should it become peturbed by interacting with another one
at relativistic speeds.
Everything inside a BH is relativistic. And the above sentence is very confusing.
But even short of that, it may not be inpossible
that once the mass generating material
on the shell of the black-hole can no longer generate enough force to contain the 'pure' energy at its center it could explode and expand perhaps very rapidly by the force released by all the spin it had previously contained.
This may be one reason their is an initial inflation in the theories of the universes creation.
I am still personally skeptical about the anti-gravity force theory being developed to explain the extra expansion in the universe.
The issue is that recent supernova studies show that the the father out you look, the universe seems to be expanding faster than expected, hence the suggestion that some repulsive force might be at work.
I have to believe that their present theory is forgetting the gaseous pressure gradient within the new universe when they go into the theory of the whole expanding equally all over to explain why we don't percieve a 'center' and 'perimeter'.
I have to admit you are leaving me in the dust in many places as I don't
have the Schwartchild theory under any real grasp.
Deriving the Schwarzschild radius is easy, calculate the distance for a mass where the escape velocity is 'c'.
I also have not read your earlier posting. After seeing the NOVA special on STRING theory, ideas seen to need to get vented here also. I have to suspect, for instance, that there is still only three basic dimensions and time. The 7 others are allowed by the fact that energy is unable to interact with each other after its spectrum is shifted too far. This occurs as it interacts with other energy fields at higher intensities, effectively causing time to slow down in that arena. If one says there are two other levels where there is enough 'time' for energy to interact sideways that gives 6 more 'dimensions' and a final one where 'time' is so slow that it only has one direction, i.e.. its direction of motion. Even in this final direction energy twists around, just not to its own perspective.
From: Uncle Al ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Subject: Re: PBS NOVA show on String Theory Tuesday!
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Date: 2003-10-27 17:19:10 PST Roger Hane wrote:
>
> I can't wait! It should be mind blowing. Here's the show's web site:
> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/ If you have been following recent threads in sci.physics.research you
know how interesting the program could be. String theory is in
crisis. It has infinite solutions both physical and (mostly)
non-physical. It has no unique empirically testable predictions.
Anything this complex and useless is usually called "economics." Galileo traded his personal freedom to insist on experimentation
overruling theory. We have expertly gotten away from that, and are
paying the exhorbitant price of erecting huge empty cathedrals to the
great god of least publishable unit theory (probably Sterculius).Sincerely,
Gregory D. MELLOTT son and computer maintainer of Kenton W. MELLOTT
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
