
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Rich wrote: > Robi replied: >> Rich wrote: >> >>>Alfred A. Aburto Jr. replied: >>> >>>>>Rich wrote: >>>> >> [...] >> >>>>>As the gravitational field strength increases, time slows. It will literally >>>>>take forever for gravitational collapse to result in a singularity (if in >>>>>fact this is what happens). >>>> >>>>Isn't "forever" infinity? >>> >>>This is not an infinity in nature Alfred. Let me translate it for you, >>>if something takes infinite time to happen, it never happens. >> >> stop! stop right there! > > SSSSSSSSSssssssCCCCCCCccccccccRRRRRRRrrrrrrrEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE > EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE > EEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeCCCCCCccccccccccccHHHHHHHHHhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. nice brakes ;o) >> replace "never happens" with "doesn't happen yet" > No, it will never happen. I'll leave that for the future ;o) >>>Rather than >>>showing an infinity, you've shown something that can never happen. Your >>>singularity can never happen. >> >> again, "doesn't happen yet" > > What do you think the work "infinite" in 'an infinite amount of time' means? 'infinite amount of time' in "real life" translates to 'as much time as you want/need' IOW, I'll finish it, even if it takes forever. Ok, this example proves that it will never be finished, but then again, with some patience it will eventually be finished. >>>>> So you may have a black hole, and there are many candidates, but you cannot >>>>> show that any have yet collapsed into a singularity. >> >>>> Yes, that is the point of infinities ... you'll never see it ... you'll >>>> never get there ... >>> >>> You'll never get 'where'? You still refer to infinity as if it were a >>> number. >> >> It is the concept of inmensely large numbers, therefore pick a number in >> infinity ;o) - it will be an infinite number. > > If it's a number it is not infinite. what is an "infinite amount"? I'll give you an infinite amount of guesses to find out what number I am thinking of. >>>>even when 1/r = 10^(100000) you are still a long ways from infinity ... >>> >>>And when r=0, the equation becomes undefined, rather than infinite. >> >> and that is why? > > Because division by zero is an undefined operation. > >> because you have an infinite "number" of results ;o) > > Rather any result is as good as any other. and that's why some claim it undefined. >>>>But often in physics when one, conceptually, mathematically, takes something >>>>to the limit (let "n" go to infinity say in a series expansion) then there >>>>is a residue left that is observable and measurable. >>> >>>Methinks you've fallen for Zeno's paradox and confused limits for time. >>> >>>http://www.mathacademy.com/pr/prime/articles/zeno_tort/index.asp >> >> I'll read into this later :) > > I'll give you an infinite amount of time. thank you, I was hoping for that ;o) but trust me, it won't take forever... But from the reply, you're giving me as much as I need? -- Robi
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |