
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
>>>>> "JS" == Jonathan Silverlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JS> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Joseph Lazio JS> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >>>>>>> "MW" == Mike Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> MW> A far better use of such multiple dishes would be that which is MW> already being done by setileague. A large number of small MW> individual receivers can be used to watch vast areas of sky (...). >> Agreed, because it could do more than SETI. We have an extremely >> poor idea of how the radio sky looks on short time scales. We know >> that there are gamma-ray bursts, there are some reported optical >> transients, but we know next to nothing about potential radio >> transients. JS> I'm astonished. It's been almost 40 years since the pulsars were JS> discovered - and initially dubbed LGM :-) :) We do know a little bit about the transient radio sky. Pulsars are one example. There have been various radio transient sources detected serendipitously. In general, though, wide-field, unbiased surveys for radio transients have not been carried out. Thus, there could be lots of other surprises awaiting us. -- Lt. Lazio, HTML police | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] No means no, stop rape. | http://patriot.net/%7Ejlazio/ sci.astro FAQ at http://sciastro.astronomy.net/sci.astro.html
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |