
www.Usenet.com
Group Index
Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com
Re: Question about classification
- __From__: David Knisely
- __Subject__: Re: Question about classification
- __Date__: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 11:54:15 -0600
Alex T. posted:
I read a couple of papers about stellar classification in
which classification results were reported not in terms of
error rate, as it is usually done in classification, but
instead in something like : classification accuracy is 1.6
subclasses.
I don't think I fully understand this system.
Does classification accuracy of 2 subclasses means that all
objects were classified either correctly or with neighbouring
class ? Not a single object was classified with a different,
completely randomn class ? I find it hardly reasonable.
And what about accuracy of 1.6 subclasses ? Does that mean that
40% percent of the objects were classified correctly and 60%
as their neighbours ? Once again, not a single object was
classified absolutely randomly ?
An accuracy of 1.6 subclasses means that the spectral classification for the
research done for that paper could be off by as much as 1.6 subclasses. The
classes are O, B, A, F, G, K, M, and are divided into subclasses with a 10
step (zero to nine) decimal sub-classification. Our sun is class G2, Sirius
is class A1, Barnard's Star is class M5, ect. However, it is often difficult
to get precise sub-class classification, since it often requires detailed
comparisons between spectra which are not at all similar in density or
dispersion. This is particularly true of some lower-resolution spectrographs
which are used for faint stars in studies of things like open or globular
clusters. I recall the difficulties I had when doing a spectral
classification exercise put on by my Astronomy professor using real spectra
taken of certain stars of known spectral type. I found it not all that easy
to get within 2 spectral sub-classes sometimes :-) (getting the luminosity
class right was even harder). A 1.6 sub-class error isn't exactly horrid
depending on the target and the instrumentation used (it means that, for
example, a star classed as F5 could be as "early" as an F3.4 or as "late" as
an F6.6). Clear skies to you.
--
David W. Knisely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org
Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/
**********************************************
* Attend the 11th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY *
* July 18-23, 2004, Merritt Reservoir *
* http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org *
**********************************************