
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > At some point, I'll try to write in detail about why I think it's > pedagogically useful to think about the cosmological redshift as a > Doppler shift in the low-redshift limit. I don't think I have the > strength to embark on it now, though. Harrison's chapter on the "cosmic box" in his COSMOLOGY textbook might be interesting in this context. I've now finished reading the paper I mentioned a couple of posts back in this thread, astro-ph/0310808. The authors mention that the cosmological time dilation---(1+z), independent of the cosmological parameters---does not agree with the special-relativistic prediction EVEN TO FIRST ORDER (Eqs. 3--5). If so (and if not please point out their error), then special-case cosmological models such as the Milne model (i.e. lambda=0, Omega_matter=0; obviously a limiting case) cannot be expressed in the language of SR and agree with observations.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |