Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Cosmological redshift and Doppler shift



In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 

> At some point, I'll try to write in detail about why I think it's
> pedagogically useful to think about the cosmological redshift as a
> Doppler shift in the low-redshift limit.  I don't think I have the
> strength to embark on it now, though.

Harrison's chapter on the "cosmic box" in his COSMOLOGY textbook might 
be interesting in this context.

I've now finished reading the paper I mentioned a couple of posts back
in this thread, astro-ph/0310808.  The authors mention that the
cosmological time dilation---(1+z), independent of the cosmological
parameters---does not agree with the special-relativistic prediction
EVEN TO FIRST ORDER (Eqs. 3--5).  If so (and if not please point out
their error), then special-case cosmological models such as the Milne
model (i.e. lambda=0, Omega_matter=0; obviously a limiting case) cannot 
be expressed in the language of SR and agree with observations.



<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.