
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Graber) writes: > Has anyone else been paying any attention to the fireball versus > cannonball dispute? > It seems to me the cannonball guys have some fairly strong points, but > no one else seems to agree. Why is this? Is there a fatal flaw in > their argument? Why are fireballs so popular? First of all, I think the term "fireball" is now being used in a rather "generic" sense, such that it is essentially equivalent to "afterglow." Secondly, under the "hypernova" model, wherein a massive rotating incipient black hole formed during an otherwise normal core-collapse supernova fires a pair of relativistic beams along its axis, the "fireball" and "canonball" models have effectively merged into each other... -- Gordon D. Pusch perl -e '$_ = "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; s/NO\.//; s/SPAM\.//; print;'
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |