Re: Gravity and levity

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Hans Aberg) wrote:

>[Mod. note: the claim that distant galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field
>appear to be `fully formed' seems wrong to me -- mjh]

I recall that is what they said in that BBC Horizon program. Specifically,
they were said to be, not babies, but perhaps more like youngsters.
(Perhaps this is quibble over what "fully formed" might mean.)

Perhaps the Hubble images are too dizzy for the issue to be settled? One
would then need a better telescope.

Anyway, the claim was that their state of development were too far gone to
be explained by current Big Bang models.

  Hans Aberg