
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Thu 2003/11/13 19:43:11 -0800, Steve Allen wrote in a message to: FITSbits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Yes. I suspect that most original flux data have been eradicated. >In an astronomical image of this sort I can imagine wanting to >compare relative fluxes and change the mapping in ways that >this JPEG does not allow. It's not hard to think of with ways to handle this (e.g. using the PVi_ma keywords on an 'RGB' axis for scaling). However, the constituent images can always be stored separately, even in the same FITS file. The aim is simply to store a colour image in a standard way, something which FITS currently cannot do! >Yes, if you admit that geographic coordinates have properties >sufficiently similar to celestial coordinates, via this formalism: >http://www.remotesensing.org/geotiff/geotiff.html Even assuming that GeoTIFF can map north up and east to the left (I don't know), and that it can handle galactic and other celestial coordinate systems (possibly together in one image), it still doesn't make much sense to me that as the last step in producing a composite image, after regridding each input FITS image onto a common coordinate system, you have to resort to writing it out in GeoTIFF simply because FITS can't handle colour. Mark Calabretta ATNF
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |