
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On 12 Nov 2003, John Green wrote: > Thank you so much Rob, but actually I am already able to read and > display FITS files of 8,16,32 bits per pixel I just fail to do so for > those of -32, -64 bits per pixel. I do not understand the difference. If you can take byte values between 0 and 255, short integer values between -32768 and 32767, long integer values between -2147483648 and 2147483647 and scale them in a range 0-n corresponding to a lookup table ... you should be able to do the same for floating point values between +/-1E39 or double float between +/1E308 ! > My exact problem in reading -32,-64 bits per pixel files is in reading > the image colors. there are no such things as image colours in the FITS file, just a continuous range of measurement values. Colours are only a convention in the mind of the user ! > I don't face any problem reading 32 bits per pixel files for example > because it is a standard color depth, any developer involved in > imaging knows exactly how to deal with it ( just read the 4 bytes, > extract the 3 bytes related to color: R,G,B and feed them into the > bitmap ) If THAT is really what your FITS file contain, then whoever wrote them did something totally unlike what astronomers do ! -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a newsreading account used by more persons to avoid unwanted spam. Any mail returning to this address will be rejected. Users can disclose their e-mail address in the article if they wish so.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |