Re: Language tree rooted in Asia-Minor

You look like a Kurgan maid Hasan.

WolfWolf wrote: I am a Kurgan

> "Agamemnon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > "Diarmid Logan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://www.nature.com/nsu/031124/031124-6.html
> > >
> > > Language tree rooted in Turkey
> > >
> > > Evolutionary ideas give farmers credit for Indo-European tongues.
> > >
> >
> >
> > > The Kurgan might not be out of the picture entirely, says McMahon -
> > > they may have triggered a later wave of languages. "This isn't going
> > > to knock the debate on the head," she says.
> >
> > Who are these people trying to fool. There were NO SUCH people as the
> > Kurgans.
>
> LIAR!!!
> "The Kurgan people were an Indo-European culture existing during the fifth, fourth,
> and third millennia BC; they lived in northern Europe, from Russia across Germany, 
> and
> various authorities have mounted a case for them being THE proto-Indo-European
> culture, from which all Indo-European cultures descend. Other researchers think it
> likely that later-day Kurgans were the "Sea People" who laid waste to the Holy Land
> around 1200 BC - traveling south along the Mediterranean in ships, with their women
> following them in wagons along the shore. The word kurgan means barrow or grave in
> Slavic and Turkic; Kurgan culture is characterized by pit-graves or barrows, a
> particular method of burial. They are also called the Pit-grave people, or Barrow
> people."
> http://www.iras.ucalgary.ca/~volk/sylvia/Kurgans.htm
>
> > >
> > > Biology and linguistics can learn a lot from each other, comments
> > > geneticist David Searls of GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, based in
> > > King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. "There may be some fundamental
> > > principles of evolution of complex systems, such as languages and
> > > organisms," he says.
> >
> > Biology dictates that there have to be 2 completely unrelated fundamental
> > Indo-European languages that split from Phoenician and Altaic-Chinese 80,000
> > years ago and then merged again 10,000 years ago since Germanic, Anatolian
> > and Phoenician people are descended directly from the M89 linage whereas
> > Altaics, Chinese, Iberians, and Celts are all descended from M9 which
> > mutated from M89 80,000 years ago. There is not a trace of Germanic DNA in
> > Iberia or Southern Italy which are both populated primarily by descendents
> > of the M9 lineage and the only M89 derivative in Russia is the Germanic
> > lineage M170.
> >
> > The only way a credible linguistic theory can be constructed is by removing
> > all Greek cognates from Latin and treating what is left as an Asiatic
> > language.
> >
> > The only thing the above research proves is that Greek, Hittite, Armenian,
> > Persian and Germanic derived from a common ancestor. It does not prove a
> > link with either Latin or and Slavic languages which both need to have split
> > from a common Asiatic  root 17,000 years ago somewhere in the Ukraine.
> >
> > Funnily enough the name Indo-European is apt since it implies a merging of
> > an Asiatic langue with a European one but the current Proto-Indo-European
> > theory is completely wrong as this research clearly shows.
>
> SHEER POPPYCOCK!!!!
> The common Proto-Indo-European root is not a theory but an IRREFUTABLE fact.
>
> GET AN EDUCATION, BUFFOON!!!
>
> WolfWolf
> The European