
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Seppo Renfors wrote: > Languages aren't exactly stable. They are prone to change - the rate > of change vary greatly. It very often depends on external matters to > the people using the language. It can be geological activity (earth > quakes, volcanos causing a people movement), drought, immigrants - > emigration and even a return of people. How can anyone factor in these > unrelated, at times chance events? They cannot even know that the area > contained the same people that long ago as they claim - those that > spoke Hittite. Lets face it, there are a number of languages that use > the Hittite hieroglyphs to write their text, including Mitanni, Luwian > etc. This shows a contact with people of different languages existed. Earthquakes don't cause language change. Try criticizing the actual article, not ignorant journalists' third-hand retellings of it. There are no "Siberian horsemen" in the article. -- Peter T. Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |