
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Day Brown wrote: > > "Peter T. Daniels" wrote: > > > <snipping a whole lot of what looks like netloonery, and has nothing to > > do with sci.lang anyway> > Well, lets get back the news on the net of the discovery of Turkish > farmers who have an extensive set of PIE words, after all this time, There has been no such "discovery." > that relate to primitive agriculture. Yet again, we have a clue to the > origin of the PIE near the Black Sea. > and you cant get any nearer than on the bottom of it. > > Were the Black Sea saline at the time of the formation of PIE, the > language would have had words for the marine environment. It dont. One > of the reasons would be that the original speakers lived by a freshwater > lake, which is what R&P have said. > > Maybe I should note another point of netiquette, is that when one > resorts to ad hominum, they do so because they dont have the facts to > back up a position. > > I dont argue that conferences are not instructive. But if they have a > case, there is nothing to prevent them from posting their data and > results. And while the supply of kook theories has always been larger > than the demand, we are all aware of some of these new perspectives > turning out to be more useful than the conventional lack of wisdom. > > The traditional view has always been that the 'Kurgans' or whoever, > represented a particular racial group or bloodline, and that they Linguists have no interest in "racial groups" or "bloodlines," and "the 'Kurgans'" are a style of burial mound, not a people. > 'conquered' the territory of the less advanced cultures. The Turkish > farmers are not, however, distinctive by DNA, and indeed the DNA data we > do have suggests a lot of genetic diversity, not a family line, such as > the 'sons of Abraham'. > > A more realistic approach sees the agrarian technology as drawing new > people to the lifestyle, just as New York draws people from all over the > earth to create a new mixed culture with a new syncretic language. Which > again, is what R&P say happened on the shores of the Euxine lake, which > drew people from Anatolia, Europe, and the Steppes, and where all the > words from these various ecosystems got integrated into PIE. But since > they were all *farmers* and not mariners, there are no words for the > marine environment. Yet, because there were swamps, lakes, rivers, and > the watercraft used on them in the local Euxine ecosystem, we have all > those PIE words. Too bad the region's archeologists have found nothing that conforms to the former Ryan hypothesis that you, unlike him, seem unable to let go of. -- Peter T. Daniels [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |