
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:52:55 -0000, "David B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Eric Stevens wrote in message ... >>On Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:49:42 -0000, "David B." >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>Given that the traditional medieval mappa mundi was designed to fit >within >>>a circular frame, what shape of frame would best fit the Old World as >>>depicted on the Vinland Map? >> >>Probably much the same as the maps shown at >> http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/202.html >> http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/202D.html >> http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/202F.html >> http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/204.html >> http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/219A.html > >But these did not all have the same shape of frame. For the purpose of the discussion I merely selected maps which were 'not circular'. >On /204, for example, a >roughly semi-circular frame is imposed around the shape of the land. It's >regrettable that both Eric and Inger instinctively tried to explain the >shape of the Old World on the Vinland Map by comparison with other maps, >instead of simply describing or naming it. Still, since we're playing that >game, compare these two: > >http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/EMwebpages/226.html >http://www.henry-davis.com/MAPS/LMwebpages/241.html > >On /226, the Hereford Mappa Mundi, c1300, attempts to fill the circular >frame with a circular landmass, but on /241, the Andrea Bianco Mappa Mundi, >1432-6, is obliged to squeeze the main landmass eastwards, and even invade >the frame slightly, to allow for the reported islands far out in the >Atlantic. > >You'll notice that the Bianco map also has a page fold just where the >Vinland Map has a straightish southern coast of Africa... > >David B > > >PS > >>Your assumption that all ancient maps were circular is clearly >>erroneous. > >I did not claim that all ancient maps were circular- but it's not relevant >to this discussion anyway. > Eric Stevens
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |