Re: Kirsten Seaver 's comments on Olin's paper

Doug,
I disagree with Kirsten Seaver as so many times before. This time because
she hasn't done her homework regarding providency of the map,
apart from that Kirsten Seaver is a scholar of Humaniora and not in any
subject related to measurable value for example Chemistry etc. Her points
are weak very very weak no matter if the map is genuine or have been added
upon later on.

Inger E
"Doug Weller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skrev i meddelandet
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Kirsten has just emailed me with this link:
>
>
http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20031129/COVINL2
9//?query=seaver
>
> Doug