Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: The Vinland Map Find Or Fraud?



Lest We Forget:
----------------

"It is their [Brown & Clark's ---- DSH] results that deal the death blow
to the authenticity of the map."

[...]

"The map is a forgery."

P. Jonathan Gans ---- 24 December 2002

"I'm sorry old fella.  I *have* made up my mind.  Everyone else here
seems to know exactly what my opinion is.  In addition to discussing the
evidence of forgery, I've also presented a plausible scenario for how it
was done...."

P. Jonathan Gans ---- 28 December 2002

"PS:  By the way, I've likely seen as much [sic -- DSH] of the original
scientific peer-reviewed papers as anyone posting here.  It's a forgery
fella.  Get used to it."

P. Jonathan Gans ---- 29 December 2003

Here's a crucial bit.  Iron-gall inks on old vellum often
(1) flake and (2) leave a yellow stain.

But the ink on the Vinland Map is NOT IRON-GALL INK!  The
ink is CARBON BASED.  Therefore there should be NO yellow
stain at all.

That's only one crucial bit.  Any single crucial bit is
enough to prove the forgery.

Deal with the ink and stain problem and stop quibbling over
words.

P. Jonathan Gans ---- 2 January 2003
--------------------------------

Hilarious!

Gans wants the verdict and the sentence to come BEFORE the evidence is
presented.

No Trustworthy Scientist He....
-----------------------------

"The elemental composition of the ink of the Vinland Map as published by
McCrone, is consistent with an iron gall ink made using components
produced by a medieval process known as hydrometallurgy.  McCrone
interpreted the appearance of the ink of the map to indicate that two
inks had been used.  Based on this, he presented his data as
representing the compositions of two different inks, yellow ink and
black ink. However, descriptions of deteriorated iron gall inks show the
same appearance as the Vinland Map ink and are not the result of two
inks but rather the result of the migrations of components of the ink as
a consequence of aging."

"The elements copper, aluminum, zinc, and gold are particularly
interesting.  All are present in the Vinland Map ink as reported by
McCrone.  The source of the iron found in the ink samples of the Vinland
Map ink could be an iron sulfate known as green vitriol.  It was green
vitriol that was made using a process known as hydrometallurgy.  It is
important to recognize that the interpretation in earlier publications
of the elemental composition of the ink of the map did not include
consideration of historical knowledge of metallurgical processes used in
the production of medieval ink components.  This information is highly
relevant in interpreting the analytical studies of the ink."

[...]

"The presence of carbon in an ink is not evidence that the ink is a
carbon ink.  It could just as well have been iron gall ink to which
carbon has been added as a colorant.  Carbon was added to iron gall inks
as a colorant in the medieval period as reported and as evidenced by its
presence in the ink of the Tartar Relation."

[The Tartar Relation is bound with the Vinland Map and is also owned by
Yale's Beinecke Rare Book And Manuscript Library. ---- DSH]

Jacqueline Olin ---- Analytical Chemistry -- 1 December 2003
-----------------------------------------------------

D. Spencer Hines

Lux et Veritas et Libertas

Vires et Honor


<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.