Re: The scientific method of investigation

On Fri, 14 Nov 2003 12:21:19 +0000 (UTC), catshark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
>         THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD OF INVESTIGATION
>     (When the Truth Would Make Duck Soup of Its Theory)
<
"Strange concretion"
:>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
>
"Another rock."
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
>
"Portion of a petrified soup bowl"
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
<
"Two branches, one petrified"
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
>
"Tree roost"
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
>
"Petrified balloon, not entirely deflated"
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg
>
"Another odd concretion"
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG>
>
"Petrified bowling ball embedded in a rock"
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
>
"Pair of twigs, covered with coal dust"
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG
>
Or, to answer your question another way, The Scientific Method
of Investigation -- at least in the field of physical anthropology --
is an outright sham that has long championed its self-proclaimed
omniscience, its incredible arrogance and an ample supply
of deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy.
>
Let Truth be damned.
>
Ed Conrad
> http://www.edconrad.com
>
Man as Old as Coal
>
And I can prove it...
>> http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG