
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"Denis Marier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > Hi Flora, > > Could the systemic approach be used to identify or validate the " Homo > Chimpanzeensis". Every one is on the wagon for the DNA. > Is the DNA 100% foolproof? > > "flora macdonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Denis Marier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > > > First, we have to define what is mean by science? > > > Up to now, science makes use of a proven model to corroborate a subject, > > > procedure or approach etc. At time, it could be systemic or global. > Other > > > people have a unidirectional scientific vision. > > > "Ed Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Here's a message to the Scoundrels of Science > > > > >>Who molest truth with INCREDIBLE defiance. > > > > >>Your crap you just love > > > > >>But, of it, you can shove. > > > > >>According to Webster, it's called pseudoscience. > > > > > > Ed Conrad > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com > > > > > > > > > > Man as Old as Coal > > > > > ===================================== > > > > > > Petrified human finger and toe > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG > > > > < > > > > Petrified human skull embedded in boulder > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/skullb_big.jpg > > > > < > > > > Petrified human calvarium (skull with eye sockets broken off) > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/z11calv.jpg > > > > < > > > > < > > > > Established Science's most prepostrous paradigm -- the Theory > > > > of the Evolution of man -- still stubbornly refuses a free ride > > > > to he landfill. > > > > < > > > > The pseudoscientists have been presented more than enough > > > > facts and physical evidence to know it's a farce but their vested > > > > interests and petrified brains won't let it sink in. > > > > < > > > > Shown are a few petrified human remains discovered between > > > > anthracite veins -- confirmed by state-of-the-art scientific testing, > > > > despite what the pseudos say -- that confirms man inhabited > > > > earth while anthracite was being formed and eons before > > > > Darwin's erroneous Theory of Evolution put our alleged ancestors > > > > on earth. > > > > < > > > > It means their theory doesn't have a leg to stand on -- and it's > > > > so sad (and a crime) that the sacred name of truth could have > > > > been so shamefully desecrated for many decades by the very > > > > same people whom we believed deserved our utmost respect. > > > > < > > > > > ============================================== > > > > < > > > > Petrified human femur > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/z8femur.jpg > > > > < > > > > Petrified human gall bladder (CATscan revealed it contains > > > > a gallstone) > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/z5gall.jpg > > > > < > > > > Petrified human mandible (frontal) > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG > > > > < > > > > Petrified human mandible (side) > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG > < > > > > > =========================================== > > > > < > > > > Unfortunately, the vast majority of Establishment scientists avoid > > > > accepting the truth because, to admit the absurdity of their theory, > > > > they realize it could seriously jeopardize their vested interests. > > > > < > > > > To cover their tracks, they continue to belittle the presentation > > > > of facts and physical evidence that doesn't sit well with the > > > > erroneous paradigm they've been trying to protect. > > > > < > > > > Why, even some of their "prestigious" colleagues have stooped > > > > so low as to actually tamper with the physical evidence in an attempt > > > > to make it go away, which it won't. > > > > < > > > > Over these past 22 years -- since these incredible specimens of > > > > petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs (some human) -- were > > > > discovered in strata dated at 280 million years, Established Science > > > > has waged a war against integrity and truty with an arsenal of deceit, > > > > deception, collusion and conspiracy -- TOTAL DISHONESTY. > > > > < > > > > It also explains why, in their own prestigious newsgroups like > > > > talk.origins, sci.anthropoloogy and sci.anthropology.paleo, > > > > the Scientific Establishment is disgracefully referred to as > > > > the Pseudoscientific Establishment. > > > > < > > > > Unfortunately, all hope seems to have run out for members > > > > of the Pseudoscientific Establishment to clean up their act and > > > > begin pursuing the truth, the way scientists are supposed to do. > > > > < > > > > And it can only occur ONLY if they bury their erroneous, factless > > > > theories; start examining evidence honestly and courageously; > > > > and -- MOST importantly -- sever the tie that binds them to the Dark > > > > Ages: irresponsible and ridiculous answers to the supreme > > > > question concerning our very existence. > > > > < > > > > It's high time scientists began practicing a little humility -- taking > > > > an example from Pope John XXIII when he visited the prison > > > > on the very first Christmas Day of his papacy in 1958 -- > > > > < > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/popejail2.jpg > > > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/index.html > > > > < > > > > and admit that, quite frankly, they certainly don't have all of the > > > > answers and, in many cases, aren't even close -- i.e,. the Big Bang, > > > > the Bering Strait, the building of the Pyramids, human life on other > > > > planets, the continuation of life after physical death . . .. > > > > < > > > > And unless these "scientists" soon straighten out their despicable. > > > > disgusting, deplorable act, they undoubtedly never will come > > > > provide some honest answers that you, your grandchildren and > > > > their great-grandchildren deserve. > > > > < > > > > > > > > Even if we had no fossil record, DNA provides overwhelming evidence > > for evolution. The DNA of chimpanzees and humans is very closely > > related, much more so than either are to that of orang-outangs. > > > > There is a case for re-classifying chimps as " Homo Chimpanzeensis". > > > > Flora The term "foolproof" is not scientific. Science offers the most likely explanation for the data which is available at the time. When new data appears, then the previous explanations may need to be modified. Flora
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |