Usenet.com

www.Usenet.com

Group Index

Sci Thread Archive from Usenet.com

<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->

Re: Time for Science to Emerge from DARK AGES



Hi Flora,

Could the systemic approach be used to identify or validate  the " Homo
Chimpanzeensis".  Every one is on the wagon for the DNA.
Is the DNA 100% foolproof?

"flora macdonald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "Denis Marier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> > First, we have to define what is mean by science?
> > Up to now, science makes use of a proven model to corroborate a subject,
> > procedure or  approach etc.  At time, it could be systemic or global.
Other
> > people have a unidirectional scientific vision.
> > "Ed Conrad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>Here's a message to the Scoundrels of Science
> > > >>Who molest  truth with INCREDIBLE defiance.
> > > >>Your crap you just love
> > > >>But, of it, you can shove.
> > > >>According to Webster, it's called pseudoscience.
> > > >
> >                                                            Ed Conrad
> > > >                                http://www.edconrad.com
> > > >
> > > >                                         Man as Old as Coal
> > > > =====================================
> > > >
> >  Petrified human finger and toe
> > > > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Au29/MVC-016S.JPG
> > > <
> > > Petrified human skull embedded in boulder
> > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/skullb_big.jpg
> > > <
> > > Petrified human calvarium (skull with  eye sockets broken off)
> > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/z11calv.jpg
> > > <
> > > <
> > > Established Science's most prepostrous paradigm -- the Theory
> > > of the Evolution of man -- still stubbornly refuses a free ride
> > > to he landfill.
> > > <
> > > The pseudoscientists have been presented more than enough
> > > facts and  physical evidence to know it's a farce but their vested
> > > interests and petrified brains won't let it sink in.
> > > <
> > > Shown are a few petrified human remains discovered between
> > > anthracite veins -- confirmed by state-of-the-art scientific testing,
> > > despite what the pseudos say  -- that confirms man inhabited
> > > earth while anthracite was being formed and eons before
> > > Darwin's erroneous Theory of Evolution put our alleged ancestors
> > > on earth.
> > > <
> > > It means their theory doesn't have a leg to stand on -- and it's
> > > so sad (and a crime) that the sacred name of truth could have
> > > been so shamefully desecrated for many decades by the very
> > > same people whom we believed deserved our utmost respect.
> > > <
> > > > ==============================================
> > > <
> > > Petrified human femur
> > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/z8femur.jpg
> > > <
> > > Petrified human gall bladder (CATscan revealed it contains
> > > a gallstone)
> > >  http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/z5gall.jpg
> > > <
> > > Petrified human mandible (frontal)
> > > > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG
> > > <
> > > Petrified human mandible (side)
> > > > http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
> >  <
> > > > ===========================================
> > > <
> > > Unfortunately, the vast majority of Establishment scientists avoid
> > > accepting the truth because, to admit  the absurdity of their theory,
> > >  they realize it could seriously jeopardize their vested interests.
> > > <
> > > To cover their tracks, they continue to belittle the presentation
> > > of facts and physical evidence that doesn't sit well with the
> > > erroneous paradigm they've been trying to protect.
> > > <
> > > Why, even some of their "prestigious" colleagues have stooped
> > > so low as to actually  tamper with the physical evidence in an attempt
> > > to make it go away,  which it won't.
> > > <
> > > Over these past 22 years -- since these incredible specimens of
> > > petrified bones, teeth and even soft organs (some human) -- were
> > > discovered in strata dated at 280 million years, Established Science
> > > has waged a war against integrity and truty with an arsenal of deceit,
> > > deception, collusion and conspiracy -- TOTAL DISHONESTY.
> > > <
> > > It also explains why, in their own prestigious newsgroups like
> > > talk.origins, sci.anthropoloogy and sci.anthropology.paleo,
> > > the Scientific Establishment is disgracefully referred to as
> > > the Pseudoscientific Establishment.
> > > <
> > > Unfortunately, all hope seems to have run out for members
> > > of the Pseudoscientific Establishment to clean up their act and
> > > begin pursuing the truth, the way scientists are supposed to do.
> > > <
> > > And it can only occur ONLY if they bury their erroneous, factless
> > > theories; start examining evidence honestly and courageously;
> > > and -- MOST importantly -- sever the tie that binds them to the Dark
> > > Ages: irresponsible and ridiculous answers to the supreme
> > > question concerning our very existence.
> > > <
> > > It's high time scientists began practicing a little humility -- taking
> > > an example from Pope John XXIII when he visited the prison
> > > on the very first Christmas Day of his papacy in 1958 --
> > > <
> > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/popejail2.jpg
> > > > http://www.edconrad.com/lifeafterdeath/index.html
> > > <
> > > and admit that, quite frankly, they certainly don't have all of the
> > > answers and, in many cases, aren't even close -- i.e,. the Big Bang,
> > > the Bering Strait, the building of the Pyramids, human life on other
> > > planets, the continuation of life after physical death . . ..
> > > <
> > > And unless these "scientists" soon straighten out their despicable.
> > > disgusting, deplorable act, they undoubtedly never will come
> > > provide some honest answers that you, your grandchildren and
> > > their great-grandchildren deserve.
> > > <
> > >
>
> Even if we had no fossil record, DNA provides overwhelming evidence
> for evolution. The DNA of chimpanzees and humans is very closely
> related, much more so than either are to that of orang-outangs.
>
> There is a case for re-classifying chimps as " Homo Chimpanzeensis".
>
> Flora





<-- __Chronological__ --> <-- __Thread__ -->


Usenet.com



Please check out one of the premium Usenet Newsgroup Service Providers below for access to Usenet.