
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Philip Deitiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... > On 28 Sep 2003 09:35:03 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > (hotmoon) wrote: > > >What we call "civilized" depends entirely upon quality of the lives of > >the people within a culture and how they treated one another and how > >they treated out-group members. Compassion is the indicator of > >"civilization"; not buildings. > > Civilized is where 2 or more tribes of people can live in > the same camp without killing each other. A civilization > like the aztec civilization counts because large people > where accumulated and functioned in one place with > large numbers of families. There was law and law enforcement > and an administrative government that every now and then cut > loosed and killed a whole bunch of people. > > But on the other hand the Europeans killed people for owning > cats, setting of several hundred years of devastating > plaques. The romans used to civilize people by impaling > disgruntled roughians on poles. Civility is a subjective > thing. On the other hand, there isn't anything intrinsically 'noble' about the savage.
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |