
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob LeChevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] (ivy_mike) wrote: >>Bob LeChevalier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>... >>> Passive exposure to language is relatively worthless, though my >>> non-native kids learned their first English from Barney. >>How could you better contradict yourself in one sentence? >The English they learned from Barney was their first English, but what >they learned was indeed relatively useless (unless you think that >going around singing Barney songs is a particularly useful mode of >communication). They acquired *skill* in English by interacting with >other kids that spoke English. Or by learning to read phonically, and reading English. -- This address is for information only. I do not claim that these views are those of the Statistics Department or of Purdue University. Herman Rubin, Department of Statistics, Purdue University [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (765)494-6054 FAX: (765)494-0558
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |