
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
"JaM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > On 2 Dec 2003 06:16:28 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (JaBrIoL) wrote: > > >All > > > > > > Can experts now explain the origin of the universe? Many scientists, > >uncomfortable with the idea that the universe was created by a higher > >intelligence, speculate that by some mechanism it created itself out > >of nothing. Does that sound reasonable to you? Such speculations > >usually involve some variation of a theory (inflationary universe > >model) conceived in 1979 by physicist Alan Guth. Yet, more recently, > >Dr. Guth admitted that his theory "does not explain how the universe > >arose from nothing." Dr. Andrei Linde was more explicit in a > >Scientific American article: "Explaining this initial > >singularity-where and when it all began-still remains the most > >intractable problem of modern cosmology." > > > >If experts cannot really explain either the origin or the early > >development of our universe, should we not look elsewhere for an > >explanation? Indeed, you have valid reasons to consider some evidence > >that many have overlooked but that may give you real insight on this > >issue. The evidence includes the precise measurements of four > >fundamental forces that are responsible for all properties and changes > >affecting matter. At the mere mention of fundamental forces, some may > >hesitate, thinking, 'That's solely for physicists.' Not so. The basic > >facts are worth considering because they affect us. > > So, basically, if there's something we can't explain (yet?), then > let's just make something up... > Carol does that all the time.. are you guys related?
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |