Re: universal ground \ a Budikka post revisited - you haven't answered his Q's yet - why not?

"JaBrIoL" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Before accusing others of everything under the sun - how about you FINISH
answering his questions?
======
"Budikka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Antonio Santana, aka Satan, who these days posts under the pretence of
: being the mythical Archangel Jabriol, is very fond of asking questions
: of evolutionists.  He's been doing it for years.  The same dumb
: questions, over and over again.
:
: For the longest time he has been getting the same answers, politely
: and in detail, with references, highlighting the problems with his
: material, but somehow none of this seems to register in what he uses
: for a brain.  His blind intransigence, coupled with his inability to
: learn and his appalling arrogance in the face of his own gross and
: unevolving ignorance of evolution adequately explains why no-one who
: honestly cares about science has any respect for him.
:
: Jabriol began a series of threads a while ago supposedly highlighting
: what he claimed were "colossal holes" in the Theory of Evolution.  The
: only holes that any of these threads actually demonstrated were the
: holes in Jabriol's pathetic grasp of evolution, the holes in his
: understanding of what constititutes evidence, and indeed in his
: understanding of what constitutes a hole to begin with!
:
: Every single one of those threads was essentially an argument from
: incredulity.  Many were completely wrong, and  not one of them could
: cast any scientific doubt at all on the Theory of Evolution.  All of
: them are still open with my last response unanswered by Jabriol.  I am
: not holding my breath.  It seems that all Jabriol's articles achieved
: was a demonstration that evolution is indeed a fact: Jabriol himself
: evolved from a jackass to a chicken!
:
: In short, those threads were an abject failure and Jabriol has run
: away from every one of them with his tail between his legs (as indeed
: he will run away from this).  I will address these short-comings
: (namely his comprehensive inability to scientifically support a single
: thing he claims) in another series.
:
: What I intend to do in this series is highlight a serious problem that
: Jabriol has long suffered from: his stupendous inability to respond
: competently to questions/requests put to him in response to the
: childish threads he opens.  He demands answers of evolutionists,
: demands references, demands peer-reviewed material, yet this hypocrite
: offers none of these things himself.  It's high time these failures of
: creationists like Jabriol were highlighted for the Internet to see,
: and that is what this series proposes to do.
:
: Here is unanswered question/request #1:
: Please supply a *LIST* of the supposed "colossal holes" in the Theory
: of Evolution.
:
: On August 15th this year, in a thread titled; "TOBS: Evolutionists
: disagreements\ Christopher Booker" (http://tinyurl.com/r3qz), Jabriol
: started a thread (as usual cross-posted all over the place, to:
: alt.talk.creationism, sci.anthropology.paleo,
: alt.religion.jehovahs-witn, alt.atheism) in which he claimed that a
: London Times writer by the name of Christopher Booker has published an
: article ("The Evolution of a Theory") in a Johannesburg, South Africa
: Newspaper called "The Star" on April 20, 1982, p. 19.
:
: There is such a newspaper, but their online archives do not go back to
: 1982, and a request by me to the newspaper for information on this
: topic drew no response, so there is no way right now to actually
: verify that such an article ever appeared.  Even if it had, it would
: offer no problem for evolution - it's not science, but yet another
: argument from incredulity, in which Jabriol specialises.
:
: Jabriol did not get this article from the newspaper, of course.  Like
: all creationists, he is an incestuous parasite, preying on creationist
: web sites which themselves vacuum their dirt from other creationist
: web sites in a mindless circle of predation.  It's known that Jabriol
: endlessly cruises these sites in his search for more material with
: which to harrass hard-working scientists, and one of his main sources
: of information appears to be this site:
: http://home.texoma.net/~linesden/cem/diss/diss3.htm
:
: In the end, however (and not surprisingly), the article may well be a
: complete work of fiction since it seems it was begun by that
: well-known creationist charlatan, Francis Hitching:
: http://skepdic.com/refuge/funk33.html
:
: However, after he started that thread, and since it failed completely
: to articulate even a single one of these supposed "colossal holes" in
: the Theory of Evolution, I began asking Jabriol to post a list or to
: offer a URL to such a list of holes.
:
: Jabriol has, to this date, utterly failed to **LIST** even one such
: hole in response or offer a URL.  I have even defined what a list is
: and given an example of one, so he could not fail to understand what I
: was asking for.  I gave up asking him to support the list with
: argument or reference.  All I've been asking him to do for some
: considerable time is provide a simple list.  He lies repeatedly that
: he has done so, but cannot point to any such list despite repeated
: requests.  So this is the number 1 unanswered question that sits at
: Jabriol's door: he cannot point to such a list, nor can he
: (embarrassingly for a creationist) create such a list himself!  And
: this is the guy who regularly claims evolution is wrong, and at
: death's door.  You would think that simply listing its failures would
: be a cinch.
:
: I don't expect any kind of intelligent or useful response from Jabriol
: to this series - he has proven himself incapable of any such response
: on numerous previous occasions, so be sure to look for his signature
: "snip" rather than any kind of intelligent rebuttal.  Of course, such
: a response is an open admission on Jabriol's part that I am right -
: that Jabriol is indeed a hypocrite, a fraud, and a liar who cannot
: support a thing he claims regarding evolution, and certainly cannot
: adequately or intelligently answer any of the questions that will
: appear in this series.
:
: Your move Jabriol.
:
: Budikka