Re: universal ground zero\ comments from Bernard Lovell

Christopher A. Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:21:02 GMT, "Scott and/or Janet Storm"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >
> >"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >> Although most scientists trace the universe back to a very small, dense
> >> beginning (a singularity), we cannot avoid this key issue: "If at some
> >> point
> >> in the past, the Universe was once close to a singular state of infinitely
> >> small size and infinite density, we have to ask what was there before and
> >> what was outside the Universe. . . . We have to face the problem of a
> >> Beginning."-Sir Bernard Lovell.
> >>
> >
> >I'm not up on Sir Lovell or his view on cosmology.  Perhaps it never crossed
> >his mind that the entire question is about a meaningless as "what's north of
> >the north pole"?
> 
> The late (Sir) Bernard Lovell was a head of Department at Manchester
> University, and in charge of the Radio Relescope at Jodrell Bank (then
> the largest in the World), and a regular contributor on BBC.
> 
> Jabbers is seriously misrepresenting him.
> 
> I would like to see the full quote including the bits Jabbers left
> out.


does it matter? Al klein claims the man practice old science,
therefore nothing he wrote is valid.