Re: universal ground zero\ comments from Bernard Lovell

Al Klein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 20:21:02 GMT, "Scott and/or Janet Storm"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted in alt.atheism:
> 
> >"jabriol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> >news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  
> >> Although most scientists trace the universe back to a very small, dense
> >> beginning (a singularity), we cannot avoid this key issue: "If at some point
> >> in the past, the Universe was once close to a singular state of infinitely
> >> small size and infinite density, we have to ask what was there before and
> >> what was outside the Universe. . . . We have to face the problem of a
> >> Beginning."-Sir Bernard Lovell.
>  
> >I'm not up on Sir Lovell or his view on cosmology.  Perhaps it never crossed
> >his mind that the entire question is about a meaningless as "what's north of
> >the north pole"?
> 
> In order to back up his assertions, Jabbers has to quote people who
> practiced primitive science.

I see, therefore because Sir Lovell practice primitive science.. his
comments are invalid. I see...
so then you are claiming, that the Universe was always here...

got it.