Re: New Theory Wanted.

Doug Weller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:57:55 +0000, Katherine Griffis-Greenberg wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 04:09:23 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  in sci.archaeology, wrote the following:
> > 
> >>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:13:41 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John
> >>Wilkins) wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>No, what you do is this (much cheaper, and there are inexhaustible
> >>>number of the core elements): find a really Dense Object. In the US, you
> >>>could use Rush Limbaugh or the news director of Fox News; here in my
> >>>country we have an object of similar density named Andrew Bolt. The UK
> >>>is a particularly rich source of these objects.
> >>
> >>Unfortunately Rush is out of commission, his housekeeper
> >>spilled the beans on his drug addition and he is in Betty
> >>Ford for a clean up. After he is cleared of the drugs he has
> >>been on for the last 30 years, it is unclear how useful he
> >>will be as a Dense Object.
> > 
> > He promises to be denser than before, it seems, and alas, he's back:
> > 
> > http://www.usatoday.com/life/2003-11-17-rush-on-air_x.htm
> > 
> > Of course, he now has additional problems:
> > 
> > http://abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/US/rush_limbaugh_031118-1.html
> 
> Thanks Katherine for this. Money-laundering, whatever next?  No surprise I
> guess.
> 
Did I mention that a side effect of having Morons orbit a Dense Object
is to form a Moral Vaccuum?
-- 
John Wilkins
DARK IN HERE, ISN'T IT?
wilkins.id.au