Re: New Theory Wanted.

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 09:57:55 +0000, Katherine Griffis-Greenberg wrote:

> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 04:09:23 GMT, Philip Deitiker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  in sci.archaeology, wrote the following:
> 
>>On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 02:13:41 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John
>>Wilkins) wrote:
>>
>>
>>>No, what you do is this (much cheaper, and there are inexhaustible
>>>number of the core elements): find a really Dense Object. In the US, you
>>>could use Rush Limbaugh or the news director of Fox News; here in my
>>>country we have an object of similar density named Andrew Bolt. The UK
>>>is a particularly rich source of these objects.
>>
>>Unfortunately Rush is out of commission, his housekeeper
>>spilled the beans on his drug addition and he is in Betty
>>Ford for a clean up. After he is cleared of the drugs he has
>>been on for the last 30 years, it is unclear how useful he
>>will be as a Dense Object.
> 
> He promises to be denser than before, it seems, and alas, he's back:
> 
> http://www.usatoday.com/life/2003-11-17-rush-on-air_x.htm
> 
> Of course, he now has additional problems:
> 
> http://abcnews.go.com/sections/WNT/US/rush_limbaugh_031118-1.html

Thanks Katherine for this. Money-laundering, whatever next?  No surprise I
guess.

Doug