
www.Usenet.com
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |
Gisele Horvat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder what coalescence time would have been determined if the > calculation had been based upon more than two sequences. Btw. I was just evaluating a program I recently revised and let it trace haplogroups from a mtDNA collection. At this occation I retrieved 'gi|29690980|Navajo_Na3X' which is identical to what is labeled Nav125 in Figure 1 of the paper. Since they didn't note the GenBank identifier I'd have to dig through the literature in order to look up if the sequences are actually the same. Something I'm to lazy to do since this stuff doesn't interest me that much. Case you eventually should have the GenBank ID for Nav125 you may post it here. If the ID's are not identical then there might at least exist three X2a seqs, although I don't think they missed one. Michael
| <-- __Chronological__ --> | <-- __Thread__ --> |