Re: Was there a civilization that existed 13 000 years ago?

On 19 Oct 2003 21:32:56 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
alt.fan.art-bell:

>In sci.astro "Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On 18 Oct 2003 20:42:49 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
>> alt.fan.art-bell:
>
>>>Having not proved your negative, my point was and is that
>>>these subjects are as worthy of scientific investigation 
>>>as the next. 
>
>> The point is, they *have* been investigate, over, and over, and over,
>> and the only positive results have been achieved by people with vested
>> interests in proving that they exist.  Everyone else's results are
>> either 'inconclusive', or completely negative.  Any further
>> investigation is a complete waste of time, money, and resources.
>
>What you are saying is that in your opinion "everyone's" (though
>I very seriously doubt you have examined "everyone's" results)
>are worthless.

Not everyone's, just the ones wasting their time on this kind of silly
shit.  But, as I said, it's *their* time, and I support their right to
waste it howsoever they choose.
--
V.G.

"People are more violently opposed to fur than leather, because it is easier to 
harrass 
rich women than it is motorcycle gangs." - Bumper Sticker
(This sig file contains not less than 80% recycled SPAM)

Sarcasm is my sword, Apathy is my shield.